What to speak of God, even the demigods have their wives.
Svaha is Agni's wife, Chaya is sun god's wife, Rohini is moon god's wife, Rati is Cupid's wife etc...
The three incarnations of Krishna, in charge of the three modes of material nature also have their particular wives.
Bhavani(Durga) or Parvati is the wife of Lord Siva
Bharati(Sarasvati) is the wife of Lord Brahma
Lakshmi or Ramadevi is the eternal consort of Vishnu.
Of course, Krishna the Supreme Personality of Godhead, while on earth 5000 years ago, had 16,108 queens, chief among them are, Rukmini, Satyabhama, Jambavati, Satya, Kalindi, Laksmana,
Mitravinda and Bhadra.
Some explanations.
The material knowledge begins with atheism and moves towards skepticism and then antagonism culminating in the improper understanding of ultimate truth or absolute truth (which some call as God) as impersonal or void. The bible, quran, torah and the teachings of Buddha of Buddhism and Mahavir of Jainism all deal with this material knowledge, which says, there is no God or everything is nothing, or if God is there it (he) is impersonal which is another way of saying no God and so on…
In these scriptures, compared to a pocket dictionary, there is only a hint about the nature of God. In the Vedic scriptures, compared to an encyclopedia, there is much more information about the name of God, form of God, qualities of God, activities of God. Vedic scriptures are go beyond the imperfect material knowledge and give the spiritual knowledge.
Therein one understands that, GOD IS A PERSON and thus has all the personal qualities what we have. WE HAVE A FORM because GOD HAS A FORM. It is not that God has a form because we have a form. The bible also confirms that man is made in the image of God not that God is made in the image of man. Our present material body is temporary and destroyed, whereas we as spirit souls are eternal and the spiritual form is never destroyed. Only the body which is like the covering of the eternal soul is destroyed. With the material vision we cannot see the soul since we are accustomed to seeing only material objects made up of matter. So with material eyes, we cannot see God. But the fact is taht God has got a form. We have a spiritual form and God also has a form with two hands, eyes, legs, hands, and everything. But the ingredients are not material but spiritual.
The Vedanta-sutra says, Janmady asya yatah, which means everything is born of the Absolute Truth. Since the Absolute Truth has got form and female aspect, we have form and female
companion. No one can possess, a form or wife or anything that is not present and coming from the Supreme Absolute Truth. Again, the Vedanta-sutra 1.1.12 says, that the nature of the Absolute Truth is anandamayo 'bhyasat, which means, the Absolute Personality of Godhead, Krishna, wants to enjoy ananda (happiness) with his pleasure potency. His pleasure potency is not material since Krishna being completely spiritual doesn’t enjoy the material energy but enjoys the internal energy. The Vedas say, Parasya saktir vividhaiva sruyate, that Krishna has got many energies multi-energies, and by utilizing, manipulating that energy, He is manifesting Himself in so many ways.
Therefore, impersonal concept of God is imperfect conception of God. As per the statement of Brahma in Brahma Samhita, the Suprem controller, Krishna, God, is sac-cid-ananda-vigraha (eternal,knowledge and blissful form) and is the cause of all causes both material and spiritual. The material world is termed as the Mother Nature (feminine) or material energy of God the Father.
Below is some excerpts, from the teachings
of Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura,
the spiritual master of Prabhupada(founder of ISKCON),
Similarly, in the gradual development of spiritual, transcendental knowledge which is above the material knowledge, one understands and worships in the increased order the shakti and shaktiman, energy and energetic the conception of Supreme in the form of male and female as,
1. Laksmi-Narayana,
2. Sita-Rama,
3. Rukmini-Dvarakadisa,
4. Radha Krishna.
But for a person in the material platform the conception of Radha Govinda appear to be obscene, while the pastimes of Rukmini-Dvarakadisa appear a little better. Moreover, they consider the idea of Ramacandra, who vowed to accept only one wife, as more ethical than the behavior of Dvarakadisa Krsna, who accepted many wives. They consider Laksmi-Narayana to be more pure than Ramacandra. Moreover, they imagine that the conception of Vasudeva without His saktis to be more ethical than the conception of the Supreme in the form of male and female.
And further down the material platform the conception of impersonalism or voidism seems to be more natural like atheism, skeptism as stated before.
2007-02-12 06:16:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gaura 7
·
0⤊
0⤋