English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

PLEASE CIRCULATE!


YOU CAN HELP TO STOP MERGER OF UNITED STATES-MEXICO-CANADA:

Rep. Virgil Goode, Jr. (R-VA) introduced Bill H.Con.Res. 40 which expresses the sense of Congress that the United States SHOULD NOT engage in the construction of a NAFTA Superhighway System or enter into a “North American Union” (NAU) with Mexico and Canada or the “Security and Prosperity Partnership” (SPP)

***

Please SUPPORT the Bill H.CON.RES.40 that will STOP the Unification of the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Call, Email and Fax!

*****IT'S A FREE CALL!*****

Call today and leave a message for your Rep. and tell them;

Tell your Rep. To SUPPORT Bill H.CON.RES.40

The Bill will:

1. To Help STOP The Unification of the United States, Canada and Mexico!

2. STOP the formation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)

3. STOP the “North American Union” (NAU)

2007-02-11 14:53:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

Tell your Rep. To SUPPORT Bill H.CON.RES.40

CALL:

United States Capital
PH: 1-877-851-6437

or

United States Capital
1-866-340-9281

House of Representatives:
How to find out who your Rep. is type in your zip code
http://www.house.gov/


*****

How to find the Bill.

Go here: http://www.house.gov/

Click on: Find a Bill, Amendment, or Debate

Insert into "Search Bill Text" box: H.Con.Res 40

Choose number 14. [below]

14 . Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North... (Introduced in House)H.CON.RES.40.IH

2007-02-11 14:58:06 · update #1

*****

Here's a copy of the Bill.

THE BILL:

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North... (Introduced in House)

HCON 40 IH


110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. CON. RES. 40

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 22, 2007
Mr. GOODE (for himself, Mr. WAMP, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. PAUL, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. DUNCAN, and Ms. FOXX) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of

2007-02-11 14:59:05 · update #2

10 answers

lol... omg... like what difference will that make.... its not like the three countries aren’t connected already... with or without the "North American Union" their will always be problems brought by all three countries because ummmmm... let me think, oh yeah WERE ALL IN THE SAME CONTENENT!!!! god relax people your little lives aren’t that important sooner or later it will happen and Mexicans and people from Canada will always cross this country and see what a joke it has become by the people that call it “their country” and go back home... this country is only still the leading country because other people from other countries come here and make it better.... so for people who don’t do anything to make this a better country, don’t have a right to call it there’s... this is a country for immigrants built by immigrants and will always stand for immigrants.... So final thought is if this does happen and we all do get connected their will be no diffrence since we are all connected anyways...

2007-02-12 06:17:27 · answer #1 · answered by Gil 2 · 1 0

Will do! Thanks!

And to the felllow that suggested "taking" Mexico, like we did California and Texas:

1) No thanks. Mexico is a DISASTER. "Taking them" would only make things worse.

2) Learn American history. We PAID for California outright. Mexico barely had any settlements in CA at all. The Mexican "government" did not know what to DO with the land - so they sold it for cash.

Texas was WON in a legal war. That means both sides signed off, at the end of the war. And the Mexicans were not fighting for "freedom" - the TEXANS were. Santa Ana basically wanted to set himself up as a king. The Ruling Class of Mexico has always created a Feudal system - the Top , and the Serfs. Plenty of Mexicans fought on the side OF the Texans - casue they knew what a bunch of vicious dirtbags thier Overlords were. And ARE. Mexico has been around longer, as a Nation, than the USA. They've NEVER been able to get it together. They are an international joke - and an utter disgrace.

2007-02-11 16:31:39 · answer #2 · answered by Ciaran P 2 · 1 3

I have a problem with a merger , so why don't we just take the rest of Mexico like we did with California and Texas.

For the lady that wanted me to check my history.Maybe you should check yours.Not only was California taken as a condition of the treaty to end the Mexican-American war.Instead we almost took all of Mexico,as we were in control of Mexico City. Here is a link to verify these facts.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Cession

2007-02-11 15:03:23 · answer #3 · answered by shawnn 4 · 2 0

Thank you I just called the number and they patched me to my state Representatives office.They made note of my support of the bill and they will ask you for your name and address.I will also send an E-mail and a fax to confirm my feelings.I do not wish this nation to be part of the NAU.

Go to www.SPP.Gov.com for the Department of Commerce all about this. www.spp.gov.

2007-02-12 03:30:26 · answer #4 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0 0

I DONT LIKE THE IDEA, BUT WHEELS WERE SET IN MOTION LONG AGO FOR THIS, IT IS JUST A STEP FURTHER ALONG IN THE COMING OF A ONE-WORLD GOVT. IT MAY BE AFTER OUR TIME BUT IT IS SAID IN THE BIBLE THIS WILL HAPPEN, SO IT WILL. UNIFICATION OF WORLD POWERS TO BE WORLD RULERS. THE UN IS THE MOST CROOKED AND DANGEROUS ORGANIZATION IN THE WORLD, BUT WHAT WILL STOP THIS. NOTHING! SAD BUT TRUE

2007-02-12 00:16:16 · answer #5 · answered by bigstick92005 2 · 0 0

l m t h . r e y a l p / 2 n e e r g u a n / g r o . m o d e e r f . w w w / : p t t h As this site is now censored, it is necessary to submit it backwards, but has been the best presentation on this subject we have seen. Please reverse and retype for an excellent link not now available on Yahoo. thanks for the info in your question, especially that it is not already a done deal.

2007-02-11 17:02:59 · answer #6 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0 2

good but...trade agreements need oversite try to get that done

2007-02-11 15:37:48 · answer #7 · answered by yars232c 6 · 2 0

it's crazy. we'll have more problems then we do now with the south. we need the fence not a road.

2007-02-11 15:46:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

im fine with the canada side of it but not the mexican side of it

2007-02-11 14:58:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

BRAVO!!!!!!!!!

2007-02-11 19:09:55 · answer #10 · answered by Eliel S 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers