One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine of the plane. Since the engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them.
But what of that deep 18 foot diameter Hole, too small to fit a Boeing 757. Could that hole have been made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm
2007-02-11 14:31:50 · 17 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
well the cameras from a near by hotel were automatically taken by the FBI and employees were warned not to talk about them
2007-02-11 14:39:46 · answer #1 · answered by Jessica 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The fuselage of a 757 can create a hole 18' in diameter. The rest of the plane such as the wings, tail, and engines, are not heavy enough or reinforced enough to expand the size of the hole and most likely shattered into many pieces upon impact.
2007-02-11 22:41:37 · answer #2 · answered by koovaaa 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Throw a full beercan against a brick wall.. see what happens... amazingly the can deforms and changes shape on impact... now try it on the end of an arrow out of a bow.. it deforms more... then make teh can go about 300 MPG and see whats left of it
3 holes no as the plane crushed against the surface inirta would cause the wings to fold back against the body as everything soft ie bodies would be pulverised
2007-02-11 22:41:54 · answer #3 · answered by lethander_99 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
that really makes no sense for one that part of the pentagon was undergoing reconstruction 2 how would they fit a missle on a boeing 757, without turning alot of heads
3 depleted uranium munitions are Kenetic energey weapons not explosive
they dont go boom
2007-02-11 22:36:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I cannot get your link to work.
If I throw my fist at a wall made of drywall, I'll leave a hole the size one of my knuckles - maybe two - but my arm isn't going to pierce the drywall. An 18' wide hole could be made by the tip of a jetliner. It is not necessary for the entire plane to penetrate the Pentagon wall for it to be a plane that hit the structure.
2007-02-11 22:45:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Joe, although I admire your tenacity in trying to determine the truth - you are definitely wasting your time on whatever sources you are using.
When an aluminum, thin skinned plane hits a reinforced concrete and steel building - trust me - the plane doesn't remain true to its original dimensions, by any means. And the commercial 757 has no capabilities to fire a missile.
These op-blogs, web sites and bloggers are feeding on your gullibility - don't be sucked in.
2007-02-11 22:43:34 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
http://pentagon.spacelist.org/
People are still degrading the memories of those that died that day. WHY? Aren't you people happy with the number of innocent Americans you killed or are you counting down your days til you can get more. You know perfectly well this is nothing but propaganda but you continue on. Keep your Muslim war where it belongs, in your own countries.
2007-02-11 22:48:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
ALRIGHT.YOu got us.Look I have the documents revealing the truth.Here goes.
The Pentagon was actually a giant meth lab.Mistakes were made.
Get a life loser.
2007-02-12 22:27:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God's back hand in keeping the plane out!
2007-02-11 23:33:23 · answer #9 · answered by madmilker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It amazes me how dense and stupid people are about the affect of aluminum crashing into marble and steel at 300 mph.
2007-02-11 22:39:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋