Do you like Bush??!Do you support him sending more troops in Iraq???

Question

*I don't report, so I'm ignoring foul language. I don't want other people reporting either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

Feel free to argue among yourselves, because remember, I DON'T report!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

For those of you who do support the SECOND part of the question, why is it important to send more troops to secure Iraq??

Answer 1

how do you like the president already voted by historians as the 2nd worst president in the history of the united states -- only topped by buchanan who couldn't keep the states together at all. bush has driven a wedge in this country that wont' be easy to remove. i receive hate email from my father daily -- propaganda and lies about hilary, barak, chavez, anyone in disagreement with the hatemonger bush. we have reached a major low point in the history of this country. the sad part is the people that back bush dont' even know what they are backing. it amazes me when people back the republican party and are opposed to illegal immigrants being given jobs. a quick looks at boarder states shows republican governors going way way back. its hard to believe people are this blind. our country is suffering a silent brain drain nobody talks about -- but honestly all this country has to offer college graduates are part time jobs at mcdonalds. the great american empire is bankrupt. the fed can't print money fast enough. why there is any support for any politician i dont understand. but i dont understand why people buy timeshares and lexuses while 1/5 (and rising) of the country lives below poverty standards set in 1979 either. move over sodom and gamorrah -- you got company. somebody get the bush family another 8ball.

Answer 2

A resounding no and a hell no!!! Our fine men and women of the armed forces are going over there to be cannon fodder and referee a complicated civil war. He might be sending them because he actually "grew" a conscience and feels guilty about attacking a country that did not have anything to do with the attack on us and has thus made the people targets in their own homes. Conscience, what stinking conscience. He wants to send them over there to clean up the mess he created while still trying to secure a favorable place in history for himself. To hell with how many bodies he has to throw in there. This is a man who said in an interview 9/20/06 that this whole Iraq thing will just be a comma in history.

Answer 3

I think anyone who can understand what's going on will answer NOOO.
I wish everyone here can see a satellite TV channel that shows the videos of about more than 50 American soldiers dieing everyday in different places in Iraq. I think 10% only of the died soldiers is known to normal people.
Bush is somehow like Hitler, Sadam, Bin Laden, Sharon .. they are all of one kind. Also it's clear now that American democracy and freedom is fake like the American dream.

Answer 4

I voted for Bush twice I do not support sending more troops to Iraq

Answer 5

As a President, I do not like Bush.... As far as him sending more troops, what was the point of it? If there was a specific mission with a specific goal, then I would be more in favor of it. It just sounds like, "Alright guys, just go to Baghdad and secure it." I think that is really broad and will fail.

Answer 6

Conditionally Yes! If only Bush could promise more soldiers for a good cause and bring back all others with stipulated time of 6 months. If bigger broom sweeps cleaner than little ones i think is worth a try, want a good sensible plan that could end this damn"Ding Dong" war.

Answer 7

No i think bush i a complete f@$#in idiot. Hes the one responible for the 9-11 attacks (he paid Bin-Ladin to attack us so he had a reason to go to the mid-east so he can take over iraq.) Thats why he didnt persue him like he shouldve. And hell no i dont think we should send more troops over there for the simple fact that there in a civil war. no one else fought in our civil war so i dont see what makes this so different than that. its just gonna be unnessasary casualties in a war that never shouldve been started in the first place.

Answer 8

Its not matter of liking or not liking President Bush but all that matters is that his Policies are wedging larger gap between the civilizations and creating,somewhat,bad impression of US all over the 3rd World, he should better settle problems by negotiating and not showing muscles because it did'nt work in past.Why he did'nt attack North Korea? just because he knew it wont work there, similarly he should prefer Political Solutions over Military Might.This is an honest & unbiassed opinion.World will be better without Killings & War, we are fedup watching Blood on TV whenever we switch it on, what the hell is going around in this blue Planet?.

Answer 9

Absolutely............ if he does it right. If the shock and awe campaign was REALLY the extent of the US power, we never should have done it. Hopefully he corrects those mistakes and this will be a true SURGE of troops rather than phasing more in. Surging 20,000 troops on the offensive can REALLY hurt the enemy and set them back to where they should have been 4 years ago. We need to stop protecting and march onward; otherwise we will never have anymore progress.

Answer 10

He's not as bad as most people think, if we pull out now all the guys would have died in vain, I support the troops 100%. I don't want to see another soldier die either,but 98.9% of them over there are PROUD to be there. Everyone back home should respect them,pray for them, & when they come home honor them as the should be.