English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Actual evidence in the form of studies, scientific reports and so on; not hype or propoganda.

2007-02-11 08:15:53 · 4 answers · asked by Trevor 7 in Environment

4 answers

There is no evidence that rises to the level of scientific repeatable experimentation that disproves global warming and man's effect on it.

Mr. Dawgs is completely wrong. The fact is that humans are responsible for the rapid increase in global warming. Please see www.technologyreview.com/Energy/18129/

The increase in warming is far beyond the natural events Mr.Dawgs alludes to and in fact all natural historical factors have been accounted for.

2007-02-11 09:02:48 · answer #1 · answered by fredrick z 5 · 0 0

The evidence is that we have gone through several ice ages. How did we get out of those ice ages? The earth had to warm up, right? We know we are in a warming period. What we don't know is whether that warming is man made or not.

2007-02-11 16:26:16 · answer #2 · answered by All_Dawgs_Go_To_Heaven 3 · 0 0

I answered your other question (global warming proof) with citations to actual data and facts.

This is not an is too/is not. The is too guys have the facts and the experts, the is not guys have idle speculation, science fiction writers, Senators from oil states, "independent consultants", and journalists who have a history of being paid by industry,

2007-02-11 18:26:50 · answer #3 · answered by Bob 7 · 0 0

The cause of climate change will never be known as long as the "Is too/Is not!" debate is thr only game in town.

2007-02-11 17:18:11 · answer #4 · answered by jim m 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers