If the jews are hated by arabs and unwanted there and the west seems to love the jews, and want them to have a country than why can't they take the jews and relocate them in a western region. like newjersey or something.
2007-02-11 07:49:55 · 37 answers · asked by DBznut 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Actually, Jews initial plan was to establish their homeland in Argentina .. But Zionists had another opinion. Israel invaded Palestine in 1948 (actually England gave the land to Zionists) .. they occupied the land and expelled Palestinians from their homes.
2007-02-11 07:55:39 · answer #1 · answered by Kimo 4 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Do you really think New Jersey would go for that? Your question has been asked at political meetings for over a hundred years, and no one could come up with an answer except Israel. Even the first main Zionists led by Theredor Hertzl looked at other places. They wanted to set it up in Uganda.
A better question is why have the Arabs moved into that region. In 1900 they could have had the whole thing and no one wanted it. It wasn't until the Jews moved in and cultivated the land that the Arabs wanted "their land back". Do you know there has never been an Arab state in Israel in the history of the world. The Arabs OCCUPIED the land at several periods of history, Times of history like the crusades, and when the Turks occupied it, but they have never owned it as a sovereign land in history. It has been OCCUPIED land from about 500 BC until 1948.
2007-02-11 08:02:42 · answer #2 · answered by oldguy63 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well if you knew your HISTORY, you would know that the muslims/arabs fought on the side of hitler during WW2. They had their own SS divisions and also helped in the killing of Jews, which they hated anyway.The price they paid was the west re-organizing the middle east after winning the war. Thats when countries like Iraq and Jordan popped up, they were not there before WW2. The price they paid for helping hitler was the Jews got back the land which has been their home historically, so that they Jews could never be displaced again. Now more then 60 years later the muslims are still bitching about Israel, well to hell with them they can ***** all they want, they pay the price for what their grandparents did.
2007-02-11 07:58:19 · answer #3 · answered by HOVO 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
If Israelis want their very own state enable them to have one in all those super, empty, oblong ones in usa's midwest. a huge portion of the Jews seem to talk with an american-english accessory and that they could appreciate each and each others employer and keep something of the international from their conceited, greater suitable strategies-set.... we could see how the yank ZOG and human beings take to Israeli land theft while its their land being unilaterally stolen... or greater effective yet Europe on the grounds that they are in charge for a good sized portion of the 2000 years of persecution. "each time all of us says that Israel is our purely pal in the middle East, i can't help yet think of that till now Israel, we had no enemies in the middle East." - John Sheehan, S.J. (a Jesuit priest) Jews have been kicked out very nearly eighty differnet international places and greater beneficial than a hundred places on the grounds that 250 advert... its incredibly evident what the subject is.
2016-10-01 23:33:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The land they were on was owned by Great Britain. Israel is located on a piece of land that nobody wanted. After the Holocaust, Great Britain gave the land to them. They had no where to go. So they all went to Israel. They made that land a green carpet, they had to fight (and die) for it many times. Do you think that they would just give it up?
Yasser Arafat was the President of Palestine and the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization)
Founded by the Arab League in 1964, its goal was the destruction of the State of Israel through armed struggle, and was initially controlled for the most part by the Egyptian government. The original PLO Charter stressed Israel's annihilation, as well as a right of return and self-determination for Palestinian Arabs, which was during Jordan's and Egypt's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, respectively.
The PLO was considered "the richest of all terrorist organizations" with $8-$10 billion in assets and an annual income of $1.5-$2 billion from "donations, extortion, payoffs, illegal arms dealing, drug trafficking, money laundering, fraud, etc.", according to a 1993 National Criminal Intelligence Service report. Mr Arafat took over as chairman of the executive committee of the PLO in 1969, a year that Fatah is recorded to have carried out 2,432 guerrilla attacks on Israel, carried out by civilian plane hijackings and terrorist attacks.
2007-02-11 08:33:12 · answer #5 · answered by sunny 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
as a jew I find that kinda funny, but have heard it before. Israel was not given to the arabs, it was given to the jews. All of the digging that is going on over there, keeps proving the jews where there for several thousand years. Nothing shows the arabs were there. Or you can look at it as Issac and Ismanual were half brothers and hated each other..and mixed families do. This hated from the arabs has been passed down from generations. The jews just want to be left alone. Pray for the peace of Israel.
2007-02-11 07:55:25 · answer #6 · answered by Mary Lou 1 · 5⤊ 2⤋
This is not about the Jews. They are called Israelites I believe.
You study their history you'll notice what you suggest has been done before. They can come to Europe, oh no no no, we don't want them here. Okay, they can move to such and such an area, but they will not be allowed to do this, and this, and that. To say it real simple.
Who wrote the bible anyway? Calling them God's chosen people... Isn't it just wonderful to be chosen ones
2007-02-11 08:16:11 · answer #7 · answered by ♫ayayay♫ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if we can put a man on the moon we can put an intolerant *** hole like you on the moon and leave you there. then you wouldn't have to deal with the Jews. and besides the Jews and Arabs want the same area of land where both their religions started.
2007-02-11 08:05:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is their holy land! They have every right to it as the Arabs. Maybe if people like you were taught better all people could live in harmony!
By the way this question is against the yahoo answers agreement and is going to be reported!
What is soo wrong with you that you would say something like that?
Dumas (purposely written like that!)
2007-02-11 07:56:00 · answer #9 · answered by mistyfan69 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It's unhumane ... It was done with the Indians and now look at how few true American Indians are around today ... Why hate others when the Lord said to love thy neighbors? They have their beleifs and I have mine, I wont move them just because I don't agree with something they practice. Just not the right thing to do ethically.
2007-02-11 08:04:35 · answer #10 · answered by ~Les~ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because they believe that Israel (in the Middle East) is their ancestral homeland, and that they have just as much (if not more) right to be there as anybody else.
Anybody who disregards where people want to live, and talks about "relocating" them, is dangerous as hell.
2007-02-11 08:03:03 · answer #11 · answered by catrionn 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋