You conduct tests on nature and gather results. Then you re-test the results with updated knowledge and techniques that improve over time.
2007-02-11 07:37:57 · 21 answers · asked by The Truth 2.0 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I agree, it is only when science test someting and proves it to be true beyond any doubt,and when society really see`s the truth and results then it`s okay.
However how many times have so called scientific theories been shown to be lame ducks and how many times have they deliberatly tried to make their false facts fit the theory, Darwin comes to mind.
2007-02-11 07:49:20 · answer #1 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The scientific method is a wonderfully useful tool when you seek to arrive at empirical solutions/inventions. So, when you're searching for such things, it's a good way to go! However, very few meaningful answers are empirical ones. If you want meaningful, life-changing, life-giving answers to heal your mind and soul, then you really must leave science behind and seek a relationship with God. God can be trusted in all solutions because He can reveal BOTH empirical and non-empirical answers...something science simply cannot achieve and ought not be trusted for.
I think the real danger is when we label certain beliefs as "scientific" when they really are just beliefs and nothing more. All too many times, regular people think whatever a scientist says must be scientific. I'm here to say, as a practicing scientist myself, each and every statement must be run through the scientific method to ensure it's science and NOT belief. The greatest example of this is the belief in biological evolution. If someone says that a human (or any other multicelled organism for that matter) can develop from dirt/water/atmosphere, then they MUST provide a scientific experiment to prove their claim. If they cannot provide such an experiment, then their claim ought not be considered as "scientific". Always remember, scientific conclusions are proven by the scientific method of controlled testing and retesting...if I can't test it scientifically, then it's plainly not scientific.
2007-02-11 08:33:11 · answer #2 · answered by Benjamin L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"how will you've faith technological information because that's continuously replacing what it says?" for 2 causes. First, the adjustments in innovations are also very small compared to the large photo. 2d, the adjustments are purely proposed with information to back them up. I agree that there are some issues technological information won't be able to clarify yet. Do you've an option rationalization that ought to face by technique of itself advantages instead of in basic terms being the most objective of a controversy from lack of expertise? Yeah, did not imagine so.
2016-11-27 01:31:40 · answer #3 · answered by becher 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it works.
Science is evolving (dirty word for the Churchies) and improving. Germs do exist. The bible and koran are clueless here. Christians and Muslims use antibiotics, but that medicine if from science, not any holy books. They would have you sacrificing a lamb to cure a headache. I use aspirin which is a breakthrough of science. Cars are also not mentioned. Why aren't you walking? Cars aren't perfect and always changing to the dictates of science, not any holy book. You need to move to a backwards country and live the biblical life without science. Your lifespan will probably be about 40 and you may die from an impacted tooth. Go for it, spanky. Be sure to write and use a stick and clay tablet.
2007-02-11 08:07:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess it's kind of like listening to a five year old kid explain how an automobile works. What they don't know, they make up.
True science depends on empirical evidence, and the Scientific Method. If only scientists would stick to these principles, they would avoid looking foolish.
Some people have too much pride to say: I don't know.
2007-02-11 08:52:34 · answer #5 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's what science is about. Only by conducting and refining tests do we eventually arrive at the correct answer.
2007-02-11 07:41:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Should I trust religion instead? Matthew and Luke don't agree on the genealogy of Joseph. No improvement over time. They still disagree after all these years.
2007-02-11 08:31:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Easier than trusting a religion such as Christianity that has broken into over 280,000 different sects due to different interpretations of the same set of fairy tales.
2007-02-11 07:41:35 · answer #8 · answered by ron n 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can trust it BECAUSE it's always changing.
If there is an error in something, Science will find that error and correct it.
If there is an error in something, Religion will find an excuse or a reinterpretation and deny that it's really an error in the first place.
2007-02-11 07:41:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No kidding, dude. You probably just shouldn't trust science, but that's a good question. I should do some research.....
2007-02-11 07:44:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋