Two Border Patrol agents who testified against two co-workers convicted of shooting a drug smuggler will be fired for changing their stories about events surrounding the shooting, according to documents obtained by the Daily Bulletin. All three agents gave sworn testimony against Ramos and Compean for the U.S. Attorney's Office, which successfully prosecuted the shooting case in March. The agents were given immunity in exchange for their testimony despite changing their accounts of the incident several . Did Perjured testimony put the wrong men in prison?
What about Aldrette's cell phone being found in the van, yet Sutton said many times there was no evidence aganst him.Why are Civil rights activists are not concerned with the civil rights of anyone who tries to protect Americans?What about According to DHS Office of Inspector General investigation memos written less than a month after the shooting, all nine of the agents at the shooting scene, including two supervisors, , knew about the shooting and failed to report it.
However, a Homeland Security Report of Incident written in November and released earlier this week contends the nine agents were unaware of the shooting and were not responsible for reporting it.
2007-02-11 07:27:50 · 5 answers · asked by Zoe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Come on PRO LEGAL tell me your thoughts !
2007-02-11 07:53:29 · update #1
No I mean Pro Legal, Thank You Very Much. PRO LEGAL
2007-02-11 08:27:54 · update #2
I heard that they were forced to. They gave inaccurate statements originally and were told that if they didn't testify against the agents they would be in big trouble. So, they told another lie.
Because of the terrain, it was IMPOSSIBLE for them to have seen what happened.
Something is REALLY STINKY when it comes to this case and all the admitted lies that have been told. I think Ramos & Compean were framed.
2007-02-11 07:54:32 · answer #1 · answered by Dizney 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
This is a good question... i think this was open/closed case. to cover up the real story.. .. it needs to be investigated by others out of the state of texas and no INS involved either.. something is really strange how they were sent to prison so soon.. oh well... time will tell...
2007-02-11 07:38:32 · answer #2 · answered by ~~~Buffy~~~ 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Hoping it will appease the people who are demanding accountability. They think if they throw us a sacrifice we will be content. I think we should go up the ladder and find out who is responsible at the top and start the firing there.
There are accounts that say that Sutton and Aldrette were childhood friends. That would account for a lot.
2007-02-11 07:34:33 · answer #3 · answered by Jan J 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Sad case of damned if you do or damned if you don't They were only doing their jobs They walked on the toes of a drug king pin who had access That is why they were sent to prison
2007-02-11 08:33:36 · answer #4 · answered by silent watcher 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
All of these things indicate that the two BP agents deserve a new trial.
I think you meant to type - "PRO ILLEGAL" not "PRO LEGAL". You do that frequently, perhaps a Freudian slip? That is more amusing to me than you can even imagine. You just made my day.
2007-02-11 08:09:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋