We seem to have all the raw ingredients, liquid water, even peptides. When we place them together in a lab, why don't they form together into life? Life currently abounds on this planet so the conditions would seem to be ripe to duplicate the beginning of life. Why then have we not been able to do so?
2007-02-11 06:09:20 · 17 answers · asked by TheNewCreationist 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
But with cloning we did not make DNA. Are you saying that we have made DNA in a Lab? If so, where is it published that we have done so? I would like to read the research concerning this.
2007-02-11 06:38:50 · update #1
We have made Peptides in a lab but not DNA. Why can't life spontaneously sprout up? Say in a pool of 'premordial soup'?
2007-02-11 06:42:16 · update #2
For those of you who say we have made DNA in a Lab, can you give me a reference to a scientific study to prove your claim? I would like to read it.
2007-02-11 06:45:19 · update #3
TIS IS the BEST QUESTION I have read yet. Great Job!!
2007-02-11 06:16:47 · answer #1 · answered by spiritwalker 6 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Because WE ARE NOWHERE TO GOD
and we ourselves are created in the first place. We do have gathered everything that is apparently needed to constitute the DNA but we are short of one thing i.e. some sense! This whole experiment is trash & it's not gonna work out for eternity with even all the brightest grey cells on earth coz we fail to grasp something very simple that we do not have the power to give life. Only God has the power to grant life & take it at his will.
It is clearly stated in the Quran & the Quran has a challenge for those who do not believe it's words, to create just a honey bee & prove that Allah is not the creator. It also challenges the dis-believers to create just a single verse like it to show that it is not the original God's word. And it goes without saying that nobody in ages could face this challenge. Let the modern scientists also try it in vain.
2007-02-11 06:25:12 · answer #2 · answered by Tsubaki Z 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Suppose you could prove that human chemistry will not produce DNA. It's a huge jump from there to say that a God did it, not just any God (Krishna, Zeus, Diana, Casar Augustus, L. Ron Hubbard, Brigham Young, etc. etc.) but oh no, it could only be the one particular God that your parents raised you to consider as the only possible and only true God. Why? Can you spell b-r-a-i-n-w-a-s-h-e-d?
Hey, I can't create a perpetual motion machine either. Does that prove that somebody else can? I don't think so.
2007-02-18 12:11:41 · answer #3 · answered by fra59e 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is a major problem in creating life -- the presence of life. Preventing contaminants from getting into a sizable closed system is a major challenge. RNAses are scattered about the environment. Simply put, life does not like competition (even in many benefits have been derived from it).
DNA is synthesized commercially. Here's one supplier of reageants:
2007-02-11 07:24:45 · answer #4 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I Love this question! Thank you for taking your time to research this quetion and back it up with details and supporting facts!
Thr truth is. .WE CAN'T. We aren't God and the people of the world need to accept that fact.
DNA is the base for life, reproduction, and growth. We can't make something come to life. Only God (and Frankenstein - j/k) can do that.
2007-02-19 02:33:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We make better stuff called PNA, its more stable than DNA or RNA. Its used in medical research. It bonds better to DNa than DNA does. It has no charged phosphate groups therefor it has a lack of electrostatic repulsion.
Took me 1 minute to find, do your own research!!
2007-02-17 17:54:29 · answer #6 · answered by Woody 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Have you been living under a rock? "Life", has been created in laboratories. Chains of living matter have been created out of what amounts to "chemical soups", and high voltage electrical discharges (artificial lightning). NO, they weren't higher life forms, but neither were the first living chains of molecules that were created over a billion years ago.
2007-02-11 06:17:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
We have. You can create strands of DNA in the lab, put them in bacteria, copy them over and over, make proteins with them. Nice try though.
2007-02-11 06:17:43 · answer #8 · answered by citrus punch 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You can't make something from ingredients without the right tools. Science just hasn't figured it out yet, but I bet they come up with it soon.
2007-02-11 06:15:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You simply prove the argument that anything you can't understand must fall under God did it. That's not a valid argument for believing, you know.
2007-02-11 06:19:12 · answer #10 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
So god must have created the universe since we can't make universes in a lab?
2007-02-11 06:14:59 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋