English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Yes and Satan answered. allah is NOT God!


The Oklahoma Federal Building bombing was done because of a hatred for authority and the US government, not in the name of God. How do you compare the actions of one crazy man to the actions of one crazy religion? The history of islam explains the actions of suicide bombers. They are following the belief as demonstrated by muhammad.

May God Bless you.

2007-02-11 03:30:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

So Millionaro,

It is O.K. for that Muslim man to kill other Muslims because of what some soldiers did to another person?

Wonder why the cycle of death and violence is hard to stop?

and Sky, Those were revenge killings and they did not die, while still just as wrong, they were not Suicide attacks.

And to answer the question, they were Praying to God, but had been mis-led and brainwashed by radical Imams who had twisted the word of God to push their own agenda.

I feel sorry for the Bombers and even more so for the innocent people they killed.

But I feel the most sorrowful for the souls of those Imam's, the blood of all of those killed are on their hands.

That does not mean I am sympathetic to them.

Peace!

2007-02-11 03:44:33 · answer #2 · answered by C 7 · 1 0

All resistence moves hostile to invaders want to have an ideology to keep alive the keenness for saving their land,so Islam now works as an ideology should you prefer to repel the yank and British forces(no meant offence).at the same time as it is composed of your question,first of all i ought to discuss that I quite disapprove such commitments,yet what can a resistant do hostile to a really present day military and its collabolrators to wrestle? per chance that suicide bomber grow to be refering his homicide to Allah so as that he or she subconsciously grow to be attempting to eliminate the theory that he grow to be killing people, this can be a significant sin in Islam. i'm a muslim through beginning( i have not been to a mosque for a at the same time as,completely agnostic),yet i come upon it cheeky to make relaxing of people's beliefs a useless ringer for various answerers do. Take care.

2016-12-04 01:10:28 · answer #3 · answered by barby 3 · 0 0

Yes

2007-02-11 03:31:13 · answer #4 · answered by hobo 7 · 2 0

This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to declare a ‘Middle Eastern conspiracy’ behind the attack. The culprit was later identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces.

Let us analyze this allegation of ‘fundamentalism’ and ‘terrorism’:


1. Definition of the word ‘fundamentalist’


A fundamentalist is a person who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of the doctrine or theory he is following. For a person to be a good doctor, he should know, follow, and practise the fundamentals of medicine. In other words, he should be a fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a good mathematician, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics. For a person to be a good scientist, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of science. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of science.


2. Not all ‘fundamentalists’ are the same


One cannot paint all fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot categorize all fundamentalists as either good or bad. Such a categorization of any fund amentalist will depend upon the field or activity in which he is a fundamentalist. A fundamentalist robber or thief causes harm to society and is therefore undesirable. A fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits society and earns much respect.


3. I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist


I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world. There is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or is against the interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour misconceptions about Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be unfair or improper. This is due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam. If one critically analyzes the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot escape the fact that Islam is full of benefits both at the individual and collective levels.


4. Dictionary meaning of the word ‘fundamentalist’


According to Webster’s dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ was a movement in American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes.

According to the Oxford dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ means ‘strict maintenance of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam’.

Today the moment a person uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim who is a terrorist.


5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist


Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word ‘terrorist’ is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people.


6. Different labels given to the same individual for the same action, i.e. ‘terrorist’ and ‘patriot’


Before India achieved independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of India who did not subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the British government. The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the same activities and hailed as ‘patriots’. Thus two different labels have been given to the same people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a terrorist while the other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain had a right to rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who were of the view that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and freedom fighters.

It is therefore important that before a person is judged, he is given a fair hearing. Both sides of the argument should be heard, the situation should be analyzed, and the reason and the intention of the person should be taken into account, and then the person can be judged accordingly.


7. Islam means peace


Islam is derived from the word ‘salaam’ which means peace. It is a religion of peace whose fundamentals teach its followers to maintain and promote peace throughout the world.

Thus every Muslim should be a fundamentalist i.e. he should follow the fundamentals of the Religion of Peace: Islam. He should be a terrorist only towards the antisocial elements in order to promote peace and justice in the society.

2007-02-11 03:52:47 · answer #5 · answered by PeaceKeeper 2 · 0 1

Sure, people don't do suicide bombings without it being a complete emotional, extremist religious experience ... after all, it's their last deliberate act as a human.

You can believe in what you are doing 100% and still be 100% wrong.

2007-02-11 03:28:32 · answer #6 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 2 0

This is the problem with every Joe Shmoe reading the Bible and getting their own "take" on it. The same with the Koran. This is why there are more than 20,000 branches of the protestant church in the U.S. alone. The Catholic/Orthodox churches are still preaching the same thing they did 2000 years ago. All Muslims and Protestants need to come home to the true Church.

2007-02-11 03:30:19 · answer #7 · answered by jonathan x 3 · 1 2

its one thing to ask such a question so simply and another to think what must be his mental distress to take such a drastic step like killing himself, how many of us can even dream of commiting such an act, there has to be a very high level of motivation or rebellion in him to have decided to act the way he acted, let nations stop messing with other nations the ground realities could be very different then those what we hear in the press & media which is mostly in western control.

2007-02-11 03:56:00 · answer #8 · answered by strivetowin2003 1 · 0 1

He was drooling at the thought of 70 virgins.

2007-02-11 03:27:25 · answer #9 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 5 0

If he know God/Allah, he should know that His Creator told us in the Quran: killing a person intentionally will place you in everlasting hell.

2007-02-11 07:10:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers