Has hanging Saddam chilled jhehadi terrorism?

Answer 1

Saddam had nothing to do with terrorism. He was a terrorizer but not of thekind that paid people to do suicide bombings.

His hanging will have no effects on the terrorism movement, since almost all terrorist groups get their money and training from Iran these days.

Answer 2

Hell no. Just read the news. Saddam was an evil bastard but he had nothing to do with 911. This was told by the 911 comision and our own government tells you this on a regular basis but, people tend to ignore it. He was not hanged for having weapons of mass destruction during our invasion nor for the 911 attack. He was hand for poisoning some of his own people when he had those weapons. Note, had which is the past tense of the word.

Jihad is something completely different. They are the Jesus freaks running wild. Same as what the christians did the crusades, or the Salenm witch trials or the inquisitions. No different. When Sadamn was in power the jihad people kept a very low profile not to be exterminated by him. Now that he is gone they have free reign. Also, a lot of these people are not even from Iraq? Hell the majority of the attackers in 911 where from Saudi Arabia not Iraq. I think there was only one guy from Iraq. Makes you wonder why we went to Iraq and not Saudi Arabia.

So, hanging Sadamn may had solve some problems but not the ones related to terrorism. These are two different unrelated things.

Answer 3

The terrorists didn't like Saddam either. He wasn't considerate a good Muslim and didn't rule by Islamic law which is what the terrorists want.

It only chilled the rest of us.

Answer 4

searching at different previous solutions reminds me that those who shout loudest have the least to assert and the most to cover. The Iraqis that Saddam killed were regularly killed with the conivance and appoval of england and u . s . of america, no longer that Britain has had an self sufficient voice for years, and we killed many with the sanctions we imposed on Iraq, which the politicians knew and probably grow to be hoping will be the case, in order that that they could portray what were their murderous tyrant as now an self sufficient murderous tyrant. attempt searching behind the headlines, a number of you.

Answer 5

Yes, and no.
In Islam, one does not kill leaders. One ransoms them. The act of killing him, particularly done by the Iraqis themselves, left the Islamic holy war in disarray, unsure about the rules.
It would be tempting to call such a behavior cowardice, being threatened by the idea that the leaders themselves might be killed!
However, it is simply the newness, the rawness of it that gives them pause. Once they get over that, they will use their outrage to reinforce their goals.

It should not surprise us that they will use this, or anything (everything?) else for a extra motivation for their actions.

We do the same in our political arenas here in the U.S.A., don't we?

Answer 6

Probably not, but he was hanged under the law he himself made. He got what he dealt out to a lot of women and children. Also remember he was hung under the law of his own country and by his own people.

Answer 7

I don't know, but we certainly have more rope where that came from. Personally, I prefer the guillotine. It's cheaper, you don't have to buy any rope, only a used guillotine with a dull blade.

Answer 8

If you had actually researched on what he did to innocent people you would have hanged him yourself.

Answer 9

Sadly no. It has put an end to one chapter of needless cruelty and violence.

Answer 10

No, theres a lot we don't know.