NO
2007-02-11 01:47:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by greecevaca 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
in the beginning, the place is it documented that the solar and stars are the only source of sunshine? as a count of actuality, stars are no longer gentle supplies yet reflections of sunshine from the solar. How do you already know that the solar isn't additionally a mirrored image of yet another gentle accessible interior the universe that we've not discovered yet? and that i'd be in a lighted room devoid of the income of the solar, thank you. If guy can improve a delicate bulb, why won't be able to God have originated the source of sunshine to something besides the solar? The Bible says that Jesus is the sunshine of the international (symbolically), is it attainable that He became additionally actually the sunshine? the actuality that He ought to even separate the sunshine from the darkish is notably magnificent, are you able to even think of what it'd be pick to have gentle and darkish interior the comparable place? and you're fussing over a delicate source? relating to plant life and the solar, what distinction does it make which one got here first? If God creates something, He won't create it lifeless to start with. and a few plant life do no longer require different solar to stay to tell the story. The Bible even states that it did no longer even rain till the days of the Flood, are you presently going to ***** approximately how those plant life have been watered? in case you think of relating to the distant threat that God did certainly communicate the international into lifestyles in six days, you will possibly needless to say see that an afternoon would not make a hill of beans distinction interior the survival of a plant. And plant life are not getting their foodstuff from the solar, they get their foodstuff from the nutrition interior the dirt by means of their roots. you ought to have paid extra interest in technological know-how type. God would not contradict Himself and is familiar with plenty extra effective than any persons a thank you to do issues properly and interior the the suitable option order. end asking stupid and inconsiderate questions. Or is that purely too difficult?
2016-12-17 14:06:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
I see nothing wrong with a person of faith believing that evolution describes the steps that God went through to create the world as it currently is. Or that God set up everything so that it would evolve on its own. But to completely reject science in favor of mythology? Only a cult leader would have someone completely suspend their common sense.
2007-02-11 01:52:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by mamasquirrel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Prototypes are made to see if something works. To fill a gap in knowledge about functionality of a design.
Why would an omniscient being need to make prototypes?
2007-02-11 02:54:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by corvis_9 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope.
All fossils and remains are from the first earth age.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Period, end of sentence.
It does not say how long ago or how long it took.
2007-02-11 01:48:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ya, in between making stupid people and sinners he had some clay left over.
2007-02-11 01:50:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As possible that i'm god
2007-02-11 01:48:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
2007-02-11 01:47:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋