Should the Suffering of domesticated Animals matter to Humans?

Question

Is the suffering of domesticated animals an ethical issue that should be addressed within your faith's moral guidelines?

Answer 1

It is an ethical matter and as an atheist I treat it as such. Personally, as with hunting, it is the motives of the people involved rather than the suffering per se that I am most concerned with (though suffering of any kind should be kept to a minumum, what that minimum is is the question of course).

Answer 2

Since I'm an Atheist/Agnostic I say no, I don't feel chickens getting slaughtered is an ethical dilema,

I do however feel that as on overall issue, I don't feel it right to abuse animals, I feel thats cruel, just not something I feel the need to get worked up about, think the issue is more a child being raised in a family where the danger is the child thinks heh daddy beats the dog so its ok for me to beat the dog and heh im at school ill beat the little sickly child while im here,

and the second overall is the issue of lets not make species extinct cause of the eco system,

so kill a chicken with a hammer i don't care just don't kill ALL the chickens,

Answer 3

I do have self assurance the comparable *habit* experienced interior the wild animal kingdom would be the comparable interior the domesticated canine kingdom. in basic terms for the heck of it, think of a %. of canine and one is attacked via a wild boar. removing the canine with the force to seek & kill prey, the %. would the two circulate on and/or connect interior the kill. meaning the different canine(s) would join the assault/kill. canine do no longer do something except the top result pleases THEM. canine are selfish. They sit down for the foodstuff no longer simply by fact it pleases the human yet simply by fact it gets them what they prefer: The foodstuff. canine pull on a leash simply by fact they prefer to. A human teaches them to no longer pull on the leash via foodstuff reward. lower back, have been given what it needed. The canine is experienced with a prong collar to no longer pull. Pulling gets a correction. The canine stops pulling on the lead simply by fact it does no longer savour the correction. lower back, the canine have been given what it needed. Altruism: ~a million) the belief or prepare of unselfish challenge for or devotion to the welfare of others ( adversarial to egoism). ~2) Animal habit . habit via an animal which would be to its disadvantage yet that reward others of its form, as a warning cry that shows the area of the caller to a predator. In answer on your question: Do canine adventure altruism? no longer interior the 1st definition. the 2nd bearing on animal habit, I see as some thing that occurs between wild animals and not between the domesticated. so some distance as putting a canine (or the different animal) above a human, people say it each and each of the time and that they do it. There are people in this internet site that would desire to maintain their canine despite if it meant the death of a human. I evaluate my canine pets. there are various situations while they supply me with great exhilaration and companionship. yet no longer one in each of my canine will furnish me with what i'd prefer contained throughout a private disaster. in basic terms a human can try this. ~upload~ from analyzing lots of the solutions......i'm no longer shocked. and that i'm additionally no longer between the persons you're directing this question to.......thank gawd.

Answer 4

Yes it should be. The fact that they are domesticated means that someone made the conscious decision to take them into their homes and that is a commitment - to keep their medical, to feed them, to shelter them and to treat them with respect. When they are abused we should feel just as outraged as when a human is.

I think it should be addressed in peoples chosen faith, myself, I'm agnostic so for me it just comes from common sense.

Answer 5

BibleGod certainly didn't care about animal suffering, since ordered the slaughter of thousands of them as sacrifices to himself. Cutting an animal's throat to drain the blood can't be a quick way of killing it. No mention is made, in the Bible, of keeping animals as companion pets. Dogs were (and still are) regarded as vermin in the Middle East and are treated with disdain. To call someone a "dog" is to insult him. Keep that in mind when you read Jesus telling the Canaanite woman, "It is not fit to take the children's meat and throw it to the dogs." (With "dogs" referring to her and her people.)

Answer 6

Suffering is a part of life. One looks on the suffering of others with absolute compassion.

Answer 7

Definitely!

Animals are living creatures and all living creatures rights should be protected.

But animals should be protected more because:

1. they cant speak. they have no way of letting us know what theyre going through. they need merciful treatment.

2. they are more prone to bad treatment due to their inability to communicate with us. they cant complain or defend their rights properly.

Theres an interesting story in spritual islam, a woman who used to have a cat, she was a righteous woman always praying, one day she died and the angels wanted to know whether she would go to hell or heaven, and God said: shes going to hell, because she used to lock her cat in that small room and punish it by not giving it food.

Answer 8

If we're all God's creation and living within God's creation, then I think we insult God by treating that creation with disrespect. My grandfather may have been a stock man (as in cattle, pigs, horses, and chickens), but he still treated them with the respect due to them as creatures who helped him earn a living.

Answer 9

Currently and in the near past, I have thought of our pet dog here as a guardian angel for us. (Sometimes recently, I even get on myself about raising my voice to her for 'doing her job').

Answer 10

Yes, and Yes. No right person wants a life to suffer.
I Cr 13;8a