Unfortunately, there are some who do. But they are a minority not a majority. Probable cause for a stop can be any type of infraction. 95% or more of the vehicles on any given roadway are breaking one law or another. Following too closely, travelling in the passing lane (staying in that lane for miles with no other vehicles around). They have the right to stop you for going just 1 mile over the speed limit. Once they pull you over, if they have probable cause, it is a legal search. Probable cause for search such as the odor of drugs, suspicious items in a car, K9 alert, that all equates to YOUR BUSTED. There are alot of interdiction officers who simply know their job, and wait for probable cause for a stop. And when you do, no matter how much they know in their gut that you are travelling with drugs, if they can't get a legal search, if they don't have probable cause, they will let you go. Eventually you will screw up. These guys have a goal of getting the drugs off the street, not making it personal with the mules
2007-02-11 00:02:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by picture . . . perfect 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
a worldwide Drivers License isn't valid via itself! utilising and not utilising a valid drivers license is a criminal offence and subject to arrest, California motor vehicle code 12500 makes it unlawful, and a misdemeanor, to rigidity and not utilising a valid license on any street in California. a man or woman noted for utilising and not utilising a valid license in CA could be punished via probation, time in county penitentiary, and fines of as much as $1000 plus surcharges. Searches; Investigative Detention: Terry v. Ohio; 392 U.S. a million (1968), replace right into a decision via u.s. suited courtroom which held that the Fourth modification prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures isn't violated while a police officer stops a suspect on the line and searches him without in all threat reason to arrest, if the police officer has a clever suspicion that the guy has committed, is committing, or is approximately to commit against the regulation. motor vehicle Exception; automobiles could be searched and not utilising a warrant via fact of a discounted expectation of privateness. automobiles cutting-edge in a public place possibly searched and not utilising a warrant, consent, or arrest, the place officers have in all threat reason to have faith the motor vehicle consists of contraband or evidence and that's impractical to acquire a seek warrant. The suited courtroom known in Carroll v. usa (1925), allowing the police to seek autos without warrants. “inventory searches” are the 0.33 doctrine allowing the police to accomplish warrantless automobile searches. In Colorado v. Bertine (1987), the courtroom held that the police would thoroughly seek automobiles that have been lawfully impounded for any reason. the only point out of race I see is from you, possibly you are the racist?
2016-11-03 03:31:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically cops can pull you over for no reason at all. That's what it amounts to. While it's understandable that they need the concept of "probable cause" to cover situations that are not technically against the law, but are obviously suspicious, there are those that abuse it.
2007-02-11 00:19:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Count Acumen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
an officer just does say i had probable cause in court. he or she has to articulate certain fact the gives the officer the right to stop you. then the judge makes the final dieison if you are disputeing the validaty of the stop.
2007-02-11 02:41:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by pantyhose_creature 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
anyone who has something to hide will lie under oath.
2007-02-10 23:53:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
they will lie just to keep themselves out of trouble,alot of policeman and policewoman pull you over just for the color of your skin or because you are pretty,name a selfish reason and that is why they will pull you over.For their own self gratification
2007-02-11 01:31:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by SAM W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you ever eyeballed a copper? Of course not, so what have you got to hide, chummy? Sounds suspicious to me, therefore probable cause to .....
2007-02-10 23:44:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
of course, especially when they don't find anything afterward and the whole procedure is questioned.
2007-02-10 23:44:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hell yeah! I trust just a few of them here.
2007-02-11 00:04:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by curtis_lloyd2002 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes
2007-02-10 23:46:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by misstress n 3
·
0⤊
1⤋