I was glancing through my boxing library and decided to watch these two epic encounters. As I watched, a couple of questions came to mind and I would like to get your opinions. The following are the judges scorecards for the first Holyfield-Tyson bout;
Dalby Shirley (96-92), Frederico Vollmer (100-93), Jerry Roth (96-92) all for Holyfield. Vollmer's scoring of 100-93 for Holyfield obviously meant he gave Evander every round, which in itself is questionable. But, since he did, he would've had to give Mike 9pts for 8 rounds at the most, and 8pts for the two rounds that Mike was dropped (6th) and saved by the bell from going down (9th). Which gives me 100-88 for Holyfield (Mike 8rds x 9 + 2rds x 8 = 88). Maybe my math is shotty could someone clarify for me I'd appreciate it.
Rematch Question: During the chaos that Mike's outrageous "bite" created, Mills Lane on more than one occassion goes to the ringside apron and says "He (mike) is disqualified for biting Holyfield." Before a minute could go bye suddenly, Mills Lane changes from the original DQ to a 2pt deduction to Tyson. Anyone have an idea why he didn't stick with the DQ? If ever there was an act that deserved or warranted a DQ that "bite" was it in my opinion.
Second, because of Mills Lane's decision not to DQ Tyson, how would you have reacted/fealt if Mike suddenly came back and KO'd Evander to win the fight? I know I would have been one "p"d off boxing fan. Thanks
2007-02-10
20:37:23
·
6 answers
·
asked by
DRAGON'S RETURN
3
in
Sports
➔ Boxing
Thanks for taking the time to reply JB great viewpoints all around.
2007-02-10
21:06:54 ·
update #1