i am wander that the world powerful countries lead by geniuos leader always going in blanders by taking decision in the world peace and nuclear control program.because you can never overtake any country by force for ever.
2007-02-10 17:13:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
A continuing civil war b/w Shia and Sunni and a newly created "safe-haven" for terrorists. We attacked the wrong country...Sadaam was not a nice man, but at least he ran a secular government...and our war against terrorism is really a war against militant Islam...those types did not call Iraq their home...Sadaam would not have tolerated it.
Thanks GW for destabalizing the turbulent middle east even more. It's scary.
2007-02-10 17:18:55 · answer #1 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Will there even be an Iraq in two years?
If they keep throwing bombs they will eventually kill themselves off and good riddance to the lot of them. They don;t deserve the help they were given to rid themselves of Saddam, if this is the only way they can show their gratitude for being given the opportunity to be out from under a dictatorship.
You have to give it to Saddam though, one man controlled a nation whereas several Battalions cannot . If they had disarmed the nation , disrobed all the clerics and mullahs and sealed the borders hey might of had a chance to stop the infighting.
Now you have the Syrians and the Iranians interfering, so why the hell doesn't the US get out and let them kill each other without sending in more men for bomb practice by these insurgents?
2007-02-10 17:43:11 · answer #2 · answered by Shelty K 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Land of the Iraqis will be the site, unfortunately, of an on going effect by the natoins of the world to stem the loses of power and destablisation of world power balances.
Its funny to note that most of the Arabian nations are funding the US/coalition efforts in the area to provide security for themselves. For some reason we in the west dont understand the needs of defence - do u prefer to fight a war in your backyard or your enemies?
Controversial idea perhaps but really - oil/energy are secondary freedom is teritary and the primary concern in global power stabilisation.
2007-02-10 20:18:16 · answer #3 · answered by max power 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off learn how to spell. In twenty years there won't be anyone alive in Iraq,I've been keeping track of the kill rate and it's triple the birth rate. See ya towel heads
2007-02-10 18:25:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we were there in next 2 y, it is hard to predict but the Iraq's government will surely be more mature! If we get out already, it will be a mess of corpses( not only in Baghdad but everywhere like the event of S VN!) Its government will fall for sure without our help!
2007-02-10 17:19:16 · answer #5 · answered by holyfire 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Proably it will be a democracy.and work in a different way.The leaders will be US puppets anyone else is going to be shot down
2007-02-10 17:22:36 · answer #6 · answered by Shahzadi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as far as im concerned lets pull out and turn the whole dam midleast(except israel) into beaded glass and carbon
2007-02-10 20:04:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it will be disaster to the USA and Iraq
2007-02-10 22:52:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully no worse than it is now, but I doubt it
2007-02-11 08:30:50 · answer #9 · answered by Murray H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well there are no institutions left, no jobs, no security, no food and most importantly no love
you do the math
2007-02-10 17:17:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋