Every creature has originated from a one before,so if we travel back through time we must find (logically) the end of this,we must find something that wasn't created and has originated from nothing,since this thing wasn't created therefore it must have been there since (-∞)
(there is no particular point on the time line at which it came to existence),and since it was there since (-∞) that's mean it will continue to exist till (∞),for there is no reason for it to perish at any point on the time line.that's mean it is immortal,and i think what is immortal must have great power.i call this origin "GOD",call it whatever,but it must logically exist...
2007-02-10 16:55:38 · 21 answers · asked by shockoshocko 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
To agree with your point and give a proper response, i'd like to throw in a comment from a young child. He told one of our circuit overseers that God is similar to the Parallel Lines that they teach in math. These lines are a speciific distance from each other , but it's always the same and they go on forever, no beginning and no end. If u ever look at a timeline, it uses a slanted line to give a date and occurance of an event in history. Our 6 thousands years or so of existence are determined by the earthly rotations around the sun, but in the grand scheme of things, we're just a small blip on the radar in a mighty big universe.
2007-02-10 17:07:39 · answer #1 · answered by jaguarboy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I am Christian, but i am also a Philosophy Grad. When using the term Logic be careful .Logic is for constructing proofs, which give us reliable confirmation of the truth of the proven proposition. 1. There is a swiss clock of magnificent craftsmanship in the desert 2. Its existed for a long time. then huge jump 3. God made it......Doesnt work Logically speaking. Questions can be made about how this Clock may have made itself, or has always existed. Some do not even believe we exist, therefore does the clock. Fact is just because the Clock is there and mankind did not create it, it appears to be unnatural, has all the obvious sign that someone made it, still does not prove that it was. It can get quite rediculous. I understand the thought process of this philosophy however there has not been anyone who has a formula that has Logically proven God's existence nor Proven that he does not exist.
2016-05-25 08:40:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One might as well suggest there is logical proof for Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny, because both are as 'real' as God.
God is a fictional character- but some people cannot accept the finite reality of life, they feel compelled to worship an invisible being in the sky that promises immortality.
2007-02-10 17:00:49 · answer #3 · answered by OctopusGuy 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, don't think it is logical at all......
In the bible, human came because god breathe life into it.
In the Buddhist Scripture, sentient being were one with the universe, and until the compound Karma is right, all descend to earth (or which every planet that is suitable for life). The first to descend would be the greater deva (loosely called god) and the lesser devas (loosely called archangels?) and finally the minor devas (loosely called Angels?). Most Greater Devas in some sense would be rather proud, and being the "first born", he would think the world existed because of him .... bla bla bla ......
So ...... basically, it just prove evolution and not revolution ;P.
2007-02-10 17:10:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your argument has some good logic in it because God wasn't created, he is not a creature. He is without beginning or end. Those who don't admit that there could be a God without beginning or end don't want to face the fact that we are finite and that the best of finite minds cannot comprehend all that is, or was, or ever will be.
2007-02-10 17:16:05 · answer #5 · answered by hisgloryisgreat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You smell a flower or the scent of rain, that is proof of God's existence. You taste a most delicious fruit or meal, that is proof of God's existence. You see the body of a beautiful man or woman, that is proof of God's existence. You laugh at kittens or puppies playing together, that is proof of God's existence. You feel the warmth of a hug from someone that matters to you, that is proof of God's existence. You hear the waves crashing onto the beach or your favorite song that brings you sweet memories, that is proof of God's existence. God could have created everyone to see black and white, no colors. Or without the ability to hear different pitches. Or without the ability to taste different flavors. Or without the ability to smell. If you don't get that...then I dont know what else to say for you, except how sad!
2007-02-10 17:09:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
who's to say that the earth will continue into infinity? I believe there could be a nonexistence somewhere down the road, and what is time rather than what man says it is anyways? Take a biology couse, and you can see how over time small random events could lead to the creation of the world from dust particles and floating molecules. Anything is possible. You didn't prove God.
2007-02-10 17:03:36 · answer #7 · answered by chickbeepink 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, that's not a particularly good argument. Just redefining a concept is a rather cheap way of proving it. Keep looking, you might just find some good proof of my existence someday. Probably not though, I hid it really well.
2007-02-10 17:05:34 · answer #8 · answered by RH (a.k.a. God) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That's extremely illogically because you've just defined your own God out of existence.
If everything must have been created, then God must have been created as well. If God is not created, then everything mustn't have a creator, so why should life or cosmos have one?
2007-02-10 16:59:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it isn't. It is just as possible that you either have a turtle-on-turtles scenario or that the first cause was entirely natural and not deific.
There is no reason that the first cause must be intelligent or that it must have infinite existence.
2007-02-10 16:58:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋