English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why has the only observable (not even testable) prediction of intelligent design never been observed. In other words, why hasn't irreducible complexity been demonstrated?

2007-02-10 16:06:46 · 6 answers · asked by mullah robertson 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Chef Bob, you are forgetting your ID talking points. Intelligent Design isn't supposed to be linked to the bible. It is supposed to be a scientific theory.

2007-02-10 16:25:58 · update #1

6 answers

*laugh* Because a religious concept never requires proof. Didn't you know? It's all about faith!

2007-02-10 16:10:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

On aspect of the objection is the charge that Intelligent Design people do not have any evidence for their view -they are simply parroting what the Bible says.

This aspect of the objection does not work. Intelligent Design beliefs may be consistent with the Bible, but they are not based on the Bible.

Intelligent Design is a conclusion based on empirically detectable evidence, not sacred texts. Man called Michael Behe observes " Life on earth at its most fundamental level, in its most critical components, is the product of intelligent activity. The conclusion of Intelligent Design flows naturally from the data itself - not from sacred books or sectarian beliefs. "

Intelligent Design is not "creation science". Intelligen Design scientists do not make claims that so-called "creation scientists" make. They do not say that the data unambiguously supports the six-twentyfour-hour-day view of Genesis, or a world wide flood.

Instead, they acknowledge that the data for ID is not based on a specific age or geologic history of the earth. ID scientists study the same objects in nature than the Darwinists study - life and the universe itself -but they come to more reasonable conclusions about the cause on the topic, Darwinism is rejected because it does not fit the scientific data, and ID is accepted because it does. ID is science because design is empirically detectable. : )

2007-02-11 06:44:28 · answer #2 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0 0

because the only observable (not even testable) prediction of intelligent design is a creation of infallable humans.
they could not even get THAT right.
see what happens when the created think
they know more than The Creator.....
they become victims of the "Ostrich Syndrome".....
"if I can't see God or do not want to see God, then there is NO God!"
"The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned."
1 Corinthians 2:14 (New International Version)

2007-02-10 16:19:27 · answer #3 · answered by Chef Bob 5 · 1 0

because it's a fallacy. A poorly researched and subsequently disproven theory

2007-02-10 16:10:53 · answer #4 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 0 1

It's a clever lie -- one that can't be tested.

2007-02-10 16:12:13 · answer #5 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0 1

*cough* because *cough* its bullshit *cough*

2007-02-10 16:13:22 · answer #6 · answered by kitty is ANGRY!™ 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers