Not Laura, but word is if Hillary is elected, her and the 1st man Bill, will at her inauguration.
2007-02-10 15:22:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Islam is not her religion but it does not that mean her support for the Muslim community shall be denied by her if it is needed. Her support is always given to the ones who are in need irregardless of their color, race, creed, religion, gender or age.
Wearing someone's gear is not a sign of her sincerity to help, wearing it wrong may even be misunderstood as an insult to the tradition...so why wear?
2007-02-10 15:26:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rallie Florencio C 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
If all persons comes into my shop donning a burka they are marched actual lower back out. in the event that they gained't circulate away, they are arrested. it relatively is all i choose is a robber with a lined face so the video won't be able to perceive them. i might do the comparable element if I the place a dentist, you won't be allowed in my place of work.
2016-12-17 13:53:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
NOPE. If you are not a Muslim and you wear one, I would think it to be an offense to other Muslims. Wouldn't you?? I DO NOT believe that she should pretend to be a Muslim. That sounds too much like one of the females running for President.
Eds
2007-02-10 15:25:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eds 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes sometimes
The whole point, modesty is prescribed to protect women from molestation or simply, modesty is protection. Thus, the only purpose of the veil in Islam is protection
A culture of modesty is badly needed, modesty in dress, in speech, and in manners of both men and women. Otherwise, the grim statistics will grow even worse day after day and, unfortunately, women alone will be paying the price. Actually, we all suffer but as K. Gibran has said, "...for the person who receives the blows is not like the one who counts them." 84 .
Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) says, when a girl reaches puberty, she cannot show any part of her body except her face and hands; . , Islamically, a woman can uncover her face and hands, but if she lives in a country where they cover them, she would be in compliance with that tradition in that country.
2007-02-10 15:26:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by BeHappy 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
It would be disgraceful for the First Lady to wear anything that represents the oppression and mistreatment of woman. We are a free country, not an islamic one.
May God Bless you.
2007-02-10 15:29:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why?
Interesting to think that the Black Community would be rightfully OUTRAGED if Laura Bush put on black-face make-up to show her support for them.
Support is shown by what you do, not how you look.
2007-02-10 15:36:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bobby Jim 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I won't forgive myself if I type my original reply. So let's put it this way instead: There are far better ways to show your support for others than by "dressing the part".
2007-02-10 15:30:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by hazydaze 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why would/should she? I would actually feel rather offended since I know she isn't Muslim, and moreover her husband is pretty much persecuting Muslims here and abroad (and of course she supports that).....
2007-02-10 15:25:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by aali_and_harith 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, as politics and religion shouldn't be mixed. Should George wear a kippah? NO!
2007-02-10 15:43:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by LadySuri 7
·
1⤊
0⤋