English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In what specific passages does Jesus tell us we can stop following the rules in Leviticus? Please tell me. This is a serious serious question.

2007-02-10 14:23:31 · 7 answers · asked by citrus punch 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

Romans 7:4-6 (New Living Translation)


4 So, my dear brothers and sisters, this is the point: You died to the power of the law when you died with Christ. And now you are united with the one who was raised from the dead. As a result, we can produce a harvest of good deeds for God. 5 When we were controlled by our old nature,[b] sinful desires were at work within us, and the law aroused these evil desires that produced a harvest of sinful deeds, resulting in death. 6 But now we have been released from the law, for we died to it and are no longer captive to its power. Now we can serve God, not in the old way of obeying the letter of the law, but in the new way of living in the Spirit.

2007-02-10 14:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by hazydaze 5 · 1 0

Jesus said I have not come to destroy the Law but to fulfill it. Matthew 5:17. He spoke of the New Covenant in His blood at the Last Supper before His Crucifixion. There are some very excellent health reasons to follow some of the rules in Leviticus but if you are following them for salvation reasons, you are in essence denying the sacrifice of Christ. Why keep paying the mortgage on a house when the note says Paid in Full? There are eternal principles in Leviticus but slaughtering an animal or other ceremonial requirements were types and shadows of the coming of Christ. Well---Christ came and completed all the types and shadows. Now we study them to gain a fuller appreciation and understanding of Christ.

2007-02-10 14:34:17 · answer #2 · answered by wd 5 · 0 0

Jesus said He was the fulfillment of the law. We are no longer made righteous by following the law. In these same verses, they say the law was a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ. That is why He is called the new covenant, and at the last supper He explained He was the "new covenant, poured out for them".

Gentiles, by the way, were never under Mosiac law anyway.

2007-02-10 14:27:34 · answer #3 · answered by Esther 7 · 3 0

Jesus never did. He observed the Mosaic law in his life and never advocated its removal.

When Paul came on the scene he said that non Jewish converts to Christianity did not have to follow the Mosaic law. As this quickly became the vast majority of Christianity is quickly dropped any connection with the Mosaic law for political reasons. (the Jewish-Roman war)

the rest is history.

2007-02-10 14:37:00 · answer #4 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 0 0

I agree with Ester, but the fulfillment happens with His ressurection. Before that, Jews were under the Mosaic law. Jesus himself says as much when he talks about tithing.

2007-02-10 14:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by Help 3 · 0 0

Esther nailed it.

Jesus came to fulfill the law of the prophets, and in doing so, summed all laws into one: Love the Lord your God with all your heart.

2007-02-10 14:30:05 · answer #6 · answered by Doug 5 · 1 0

The Catholic Church figured all this out by the end of the 1st century, and it was very clearly explained in the following official church document.

Whether you're Catholic or not, this is definitely worth reading, as it provides the necessary insight into the issue, from many different ages, and from many different perspectives:

Pius XII: Mystici Corporis, 29: "And first of all, by the death of our Redeemer, the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished; then the Law of Christ together with its mysteries, enactments, institutions, and sacred rites was ratified for the whole world in the blood of Jesus Christ...but on the Gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross, establishing the New Testament in His blood shed for the whole human race. "To such an extent, then," says St. Leo the Great, speaking of the Cross of our Lord, "was there effected a transfer from the Law to the Gospel, from the Synagogue to the Church, from the many sacrifices to one Victim, that, as Our Lord expired, that mystical veil which shut off the innermost part of the temple and its sacred secret was rent violently from top to bottom."

30: "On the Cross then the Old Law died, soon to be buried and to be a bearer of death, in order to give way to the New Testament of which Christ had chosen the Apostles as qualified ministers"
Council of Trent, ch 1, 793: "but not even the Jews by the very letter of the law of Moses were able to be liberated or to rise therefrom"
Council of Trent, Session 6, ch 2: "that He might both redeem the Jews, who were under the Law"
Council of Trent, Canon 1: "If anyone shall say that man can be justified before God by his own works which are done through his own natural powers, or through the teaching of the Law...let him be anathema."
Council of Florence, DS 695: "There are seven sacraments of the new Law: namely, baptism, confirmation, Eucharist, penance, extreme unction, orders, and matrimony, which differ a great deal from the sacraments of the Old Law. For those of the Old Law did not effect grace, but only pronounced that it should be given through the passion of Christ; these sacraments of ours contain grace, and confer it upon those who receive them worthily."
Council of Florence, DS 712: "It firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosiac law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to the divine worship at that time, after our Lord's coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of the law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally."
"All, therefore, who after that time observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors. Therefore, it commands all who glory in the name of Christian, at whatever time, before or after baptism' to cease entirely from circumcision, since, whether or not one places hope in it, it cannot be observed at all without the loss of eternal salvation."
Pope Benedict XIV, Ex Quo Primum, #59: "However they are not attempting to observe the precepts of the old Law, which as everyone knows have been revoked by the coming of Christ."
Pope Benedict XIV, Ex Quo Primum, #61: "The first consideration is that the ceremonies of the Mosaic law were abrogated by the coming of Christ and they can no longer be observed without sin after the promulgation of the Gospel."
Pius VI, DS 1519-1520 (condemned the following): "Likewise, the doctrine which adds that under the Law man 'became a prevaricator, since he was powerless to observe it, not indeed by the fault of the Law, which was most sacred, but by the guilt of man, who, under the Law, without grace, became more and more a prevaricator'; and it further adds, 'that the Law, if it did not heal the heart of man, brought it about that he would recognize his evil, and, being convinced of his weakness, would desire the grace of a mediator'; in this part it generally intimates that man became a prevaricator through the nonobservance of the Law which he was powerless to observe, as if 'He who is just could command something impossible, or He who is pious would be likely to condemn man for that which he could not avoid' (from St. Caesarius Serm. 73, in append., St. Augustine, Serm. 273, edit. Maurin; from St. August., De nat, et "rat., e. 43; De "rat. et lib. arb., e. 16, Enarr. in psalm. 56, n. I),-- false scandalous, impious, condemned in Baius (see n. 1504).
1520 20. "In that part in which it is to be understood that man, while under the Law and without grace, could conceive a desire for the grace of a Mediator related to the salvation promised through Christ, as if 'grace itself does not effect that He be invoked by us' (from Conc. Araus. II, can. 3 [v.n. 176]),-- the proposition as it stands, deceitful, suspect, favorable to the Semipelagian heresy.

2007-02-10 17:55:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers