2007-02-10 13:42:45 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Auto Racing ➔ NASCAR
Your terms are wrong but it probably is a good comparision. Horse owners don't own the rider, they have them under contract only to ride for them. You can have a contract with a Nascar driver but you can't own them. Can you imagine your boss owning you because you work for him? Yikes.
2007-02-11 03:53:45 · answer #1 · answered by Donny H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The driver is an independent contractor to the team owner,th who intern pays the driver to drive the cars he owns.
Yes this could be simular as owning a horse and hiring a jocky.
2007-02-10 15:38:41 · answer #2 · answered by blakree 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i guess you could compare it to that. the owner owns the car, similar to the way a horse owner owns a horse, yes. and they hire the drivers to drive them, similar to the way horse owners would hire jockeys. car owners don't 'own' the drivers, just like a horse owner doesn't 'own' a jockey. but yes, good point, it is similar
2007-02-10 14:47:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not driver, but own all cars, and and they own the contract theat the driver signs so in a way they do own them.
2007-02-10 15:12:55 · answer #4 · answered by i know all 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋