Oh well, it just means that fewer rednecks will be coming home I guess. So, it's no big loss. There are enough janitors and greasemonkeys as it is...
2007-02-10 13:24:18 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Luvin,
My question is that sentence with this (?) symbol at the end.
That's a question.
2007-02-10 13:28:34 · update #1
Anna S,
just what "freedoms" are being lost here?
In WWII there was a clear threat. The ONLY threat here is the loss of oil and the resulting revenue for the big oil companies.
Wake up willya?
2007-02-11 02:53:16 · update #2
Your such a sweet feller! Honest i like you!! Of course i like everyone..its a problem i have. Well thank you for answering my question to the best of your ability..lol..or lack there of..sorry..that wasnt a wise crack to you personally. And hey! I aint no redneck sir ya har? lol Well peace love and may god be with you whether it is your wish or night. Peace my friend. And though i am not yet on my way to iraq i might be in say a couple of months to a year. My main goal is to defend my state and the people in it.
2007-02-10 13:33:33 · answer #1 · answered by nessa 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If those troops, and others weren't doing their job, there is a very good chance that we would have had more attacks on American soil. And I bet that you for one would be screaming that "Something has to be done about the terrorists!!!!".
Pick the nearest large town near you - Indianapolis, Seattle, Chicago, Omaha, Jacksonville, Mobile, any town will do. Imagine a widespread anthrax scare, or a car bomb next to a crowded shopping center, or even a dirty radioactive bomb that just scattered nuclear material over a wide area. Think just a minute what that would mean to you. I'm betting that you can't even imagine one tenth of all the implications. Well, maybe your attitude will change once you get old enough to start Driver's Ed.
2007-02-10 13:33:21 · answer #2 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah they may well be withdrawn, there is not any solid preparation there. there is extra occurring than our administration envisioned, even however they sense the might prefer to stay there, so as that they do no longer look undesirable and sparkling up the probelm of instability. Its purely going to worsen. Afghanistan is a perfect , Iraq isn't. If Bush thought it grew to improve into for Terrorisim and the persons of Iraq , then examine out North Korea, Darfur, and diverse place in Africa. **** Saddam the persons there tolerated him. And there would have been sanctions contained interior the process the UN on the midsection easter international places for assisting terrorist. yet yet another situation Its no longer consumer-friendly to soilders and its no longer any soilder's fault for the atrocities that are occurring in Iraq. And this conflict is indoors the comparable course as Vietnam. And on precise of that, we are spending further funds scuffling with , and there is not any funds to help our soilders by means of PTS (positioned up stressful syndrome). till the U.S. is making plans on colonizing Iraq , shall we consistently purely pull our troops out and take the blame for ******* up the rustic. enable their very own human beings wrestle over who receives to rule it.
2016-12-17 13:51:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Bush goes ahead with his proposed surge, there will be approximately 22,000 combat troops and tens of thousands of additional support troops going over to Iraq. The generals say that there will be insufficient armor and equipment for them until summer. To my mind, that is unacceptable.
I find your characterization of the military short sighted and classist. It appears that you think that only Southerners and blue collar workers enlist. This is not the case-ask anyone in Vermont, California, or Illinois, for example. And not everyone is a blue collar worker who enrolls, either. If this were the case, there would be no military lawyers or medical professionals.
Personally, I feel that the invasion of Iraq was a mistake from the beginning, and I have peacefully demonstrated against Bush's policies, especially those that give veterans short shrift. I do not like the attitude that rich people "have better things to do" than serve their country. I am especially incensed at Young Republicans who say they are for the war but do not enlist and do nothing to help those in the military. I support Operation Yellow Elephant to shame them into walking their talk.
That being said, I am equally incensed by so-called "liberals" who would demean our military. I may not agree with Bush, but that does not mean that I disrespect those who have chosen to serve their country. On the contrary; I feel it is my duty to make sure that they serve honorably with proper equipment and with veteran's services when they return. To demean a soldier, sailor, or Marine is to demean our nation. If you don't like Bush's policies, put the blame where it belongs--on Bush. Not on those who nobly serve and are willing to make the supreme sacrifice.
2007-02-10 13:36:37 · answer #4 · answered by KCBA 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
HOW DARE U SAY SUCH A THING!!
While you are warm and snuggly in your bed!
You are a creep!! Listen our troops are over in some foreign land fighting a war between Shia's /Sunnis that we really don't understand. So many men/women lost limbs & sons & daughters!! I hope your question gets deleted because you are a fool! And I hate you!
2007-02-10 13:31:15 · answer #5 · answered by Mee-OW =^..^= 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For shame on you !
Each man/woman who signs on that dotted line KNOWING there is a more than strong possibility they will end up as cannon fodder for the politicians greed deserves YOUR FULL SUPPORT irrespective of where he/she might be from ther in USA.
They are doing a job that I am certain you are not.. not are ever likely to ever do.
You just re-inforce my oppinion about your country....
Duh !!
2007-02-10 13:35:50 · answer #6 · answered by Hello 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Look pal, these are men and women who die so that you have the freedom to be such a prick. If you think it's no big deal then why don't you go over . If not then do us all a favor and shut the hll up.
2007-02-10 13:30:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anna S 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Using your Daddy's computer to insult the troops is very manly.
A question mark behind a statement is bad punctuation. It doesn't make the statement a question.
You really are stupid aren't you.
Notice, no question mark behind that?
2007-02-10 13:27:54 · answer #8 · answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You are a jerk! My uncle is in the army, and those guys over there are not rednecks. They are brave people. And until you go over there you should not judge people. And it sounds to me like YOU are the redneck! No correction, you are a retard!
2007-02-10 13:27:56 · answer #9 · answered by Yay me!!!! 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
jd must die
dr cox hates you
janitor is your soul
you are only hurting yourself
we all hate you
get worse soon
OR WAKE UP!
2007-02-10 13:28:04 · answer #10 · answered by opaulo30 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋