2007-02-10 11:00:53 · 23 answers · asked by Jim Darwin 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
First you must think like a creationist. So you will have to start by inserting your head into your rectum.
2007-02-10 11:22:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
1. Be sure you are doing "experiments". "Expiriments" are what you do when you throw out items past their "Use by" dates.
2. Whatever experiment you do, you will have to somehow exclude the possibility of the Deity influencing at least one run of the experiment. Otherwise, the concept of the null hypothesis becomes invalid.
3. You may have difficulties in coming up with ideas. "Creation Science" does not appear to be able to develop hypotheses that can be tested with results that can be disproven or falsified. There is no mechanism for altering basic concepts except through dogmatic statements. Actually, you really have to decided whether the Deity started everything in process and then went out for lunch or if it's still sticking its manipulatory digits back into reality and stirring things up. This would have to be considered in any experiment design.
2007-02-10 11:13:36 · answer #2 · answered by eriurana 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not everything needs an experiment to prove it, only a childish person would even think that.If you are stuck in a vortex of doubt that is really your problem, if you have such an inability of complex thought that you must touch things like a baby needs training wheels that is really a weakness, not a strength. Creation exists and only a mind trained to doubt and resist rational thought would fall into these nonsensical difficuties.Do you even understand the significance of an experiment and what it means and why it came to be thought necessary for epistemelogical reasons? Are you aware of the philosophical underpinnings of what is called science?
Non creation is not the underpinning of progress in science, how can any body really let themselves say that? Experiemnts are necessary for our own handicaps, for our own needs, and that wether you believe in God with a faithful love and worship or you do not worship or love God. The behavior of organisms is not dependent on our belief or unbelief.
2007-02-10 11:11:54 · answer #3 · answered by Socinian F 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Being that you can't spell anything correctly, any experiement you do will have a finding so incorrect, I will say yes. Only someone that isn't too bright could come to the conclusion of creation when applying anything invovling science.
2007-02-10 11:09:18 · answer #4 · answered by agnosticaatheistica 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I defy you to find one scientist that is working in "Creation Science" as a way to conduct experiments and reach theoretical conclusions. They would be laughed out of the professional journals. All the biologists who are also creation scientists or ID theorists are working in other fields.
^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^
2007-02-10 11:10:52 · answer #5 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you just build a boat and take it to a desert to see if it floats? It's just as pointless as trying to prove creation science
2007-02-10 11:16:17 · answer #6 · answered by Desiree J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vanilla icecream. Brandy. Creme de Cacao. Creates a Brandy Alexander!
2007-02-10 11:06:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Do a reverse science project and turn yourself into a monkey.
2007-02-10 11:14:21 · answer #8 · answered by beek 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can not it happened in the past and cannot happen again, the same with evolution you can not prove it in a laboratory experiment even though they like to boast that they have. Both are faith based systems. You have to look at each one and say with what we have which model best describes the situation that we have.
2007-02-10 11:06:36 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The same ones you can do at home to prove evolutionary science.
Both beliefs require a measure of faith.
2007-02-10 11:09:39 · answer #10 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋