Even if God's existence is rational why wouldn't all religions have an equal claim that it is their version of God that is being proved?
(The rational proofs of God tend to focus on the creating God more than the loving or just God discussed by revealed religions.)
2007-02-10 10:26:36 · 10 answers · asked by NHBaritone 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well there are flaws in each religion in this world. I believe mine may be right, but I am also open to others. Some may say it's beyond the human mind, but with society being the way it is, many people would refuse to believe the "right" one if a certain religion was proved.
2007-02-10 10:30:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The only "rational" proof of God's existence that I know of is a long-term personal relationship with him. This is really the only way of getting to know him. If you're waiting for the Red Sea to part, you might have to wait a long time.
This kind of experience (the relationship thing) is by nature a religious experience. The only "religions" it can point to are those acknowledging God's existence (and this acknowledgement is a result of the personal relationship, not the other way around).
For example, Abraham was born, raised and educated in Ur where they worshipped an entirely different pantheon of deities. He observed on day that the sun, moon and stars being worshipped were all controlled, they all followed the exact same paths every day, every year. So he wanted to know who was pulling the strings. That's how he met God. He came to God, Gog didn't come to him.
2007-02-10 10:37:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the rational proof of God does not point to any particular religion.
Now about about the rational of Jesus is in fact the Son of God? That does point to only one religion.
2007-02-10 10:30:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
an massive majority of Jews and Christian definitely everyone seems to be mushy with the super Bang, in itself, the BB would not ward off the existence of "god". they are able to be considered like minded. yet permit's assume (however completely unproven) that some "god" does exist. That "god" would desire to just to boot be a Deist style of "god" that created the Universe and then left it to run itself. For the religious that think of THEIR "god" is the writer, they have the double burden of proving that A) ANY "god" does exist, and B) proving that that's THEIR "god". think that considered one of those "own god" does exist, they're supposedly countless in potential and for this reason would desire to care approximately ALL of their creations the two. yet while they did that, then ALL of their creations would be cared for the two and there would be no question that purely a number of those would be "saved". So the assumption of an endless yet "own" god, to me, presupposes that mentioned "god" would by no potential have invented considered one of these element as "hell". advantages on your journey!
2016-11-03 02:35:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Each religion has their own way of showing their love for God!
2007-02-10 10:38:16 · answer #5 · answered by Gerry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If a god exists the only true religion in my opinion would have
to be Deism.
2007-02-10 10:30:23 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God the Father, who revealed himself through his Son Jesus founded only one Church. That happens to be the Catholic Church.
2007-02-10 10:38:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You said rational proofs of god. hahahahahahaha
2007-02-10 10:30:38 · answer #8 · answered by Derek 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"God IS Love" ... that's it!! Love is not God. So throw out all the religion crap and go with that!
2007-02-10 10:31:23 · answer #9 · answered by Yahoo Answer Rat 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
thereare no "rational" proofs of god's existance. Only irrational ones.
2007-02-10 10:30:44 · answer #10 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋