My answer to both questions is a big loud no, but then what do I know? I've studied evolution, but I can hardly imagine how creation science works. HOW DOES IT WORK? What I don't understand is how does it even have a leg to stand on. And can anybody discuss it with a straight face?
Then just yesterday I caught myself asking, can somebody get a degree in creation science, and then what?
Question: Anybody with a degree in creation science care to make something of it?
2007-02-10 08:53:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Creation science would be a hoot if there weren't so many gullible idiots parroting their nonsense and confusing the population at large.
I like your idea of a PhD in the creation sciences.
Maybe Dr. Dino would know. Oh no, wait his Ph.D is from an unaccredited university, in Christian education.
2007-02-10 09:00:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What are the big questions?
Where do I come from?
What am I doing here?
Where am I going?
Both evolution and creationism answer these questions based on philosophy. If you are satisfied with the answers supplied by evolution, what is you beef?
Creationists have two major problems with macroevolution : (a) according to science, living things come from other living things but evolution says that living things come from non-living things, (b) if evolution is true, there should be millions of transition forms. Yet the Geologic Column shows species fully formed. Where are those missing links?
Creationists are wondering why macroevolution is taught as fact in classrooms since it does not have a leg to stand on.
Have you ever heard the following expression? If it looks like a horse, walks like a horse, neighs like a horse, eats like a horse, it probably is a horse? That is the basis for creation science. Which is much more than can be said for macroevolution.
2007-02-10 17:11:52 · answer #2 · answered by flandargo 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And natural science answers all questions? And of course we know that a degree in natural science is very sought after. There is a better chance of getting a job outside teaching with a degree in Creationism than in natural science.. Now I didn't mention a useful science like geology or even ecology. But a generic science like natural science is only useful in teaching junior high school science classes. At any rate there is no proof for spontaneous life generation in fact there is more evidence for designed creation... Remember those first two words of the verse I used to tell you what christian believe. You are displaying again how well they still suit you.... Jim
2007-02-10 17:46:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
See, I'm just the opposite. I've studied evolution now for about 30 years and I can't figure out how it works?
How do you arrive at conclusions if you're just guessing?
And with so many things about evolution that you have to take on faith, why isn't it called a cult instead of a science? Science relies on information, doesn't it?
Take for instance speciation, the process of species developing sufficient changes to become a new species. Why is it that human beings NEVER change? Not a single new species of humans has ever been observed in written history?
Yet we take on faith that they just do.
2007-02-10 16:59:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I believe an Honorary Degree will be given to the individual who discovers the creator of God.
God is certainly too complex to have just evolved, someone must have created Him
2007-02-10 17:00:28 · answer #5 · answered by Honest Opinion 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Creation science is a religion. A true science does not start with the conclusion.
Evolution is the conclusion to the true creation science.
2007-02-10 16:57:23 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Bodhisattva 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
it is not a true science it just christian trying to put god into science and making them selves look like fools all over the world
2007-02-10 17:38:58 · answer #7 · answered by andrew w 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We came from somewhere. God created us. The fossils show bursts of life, not evolution.
2007-02-10 16:59:47 · answer #8 · answered by RB 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
So your question is??? and you answered it yourself. Are "answers" even necessary to you?
Let me follow your example and answer my own question...no.
Evolution doesn't have a leg to stand on.
2007-02-10 16:59:37 · answer #9 · answered by sheepinarowboat 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
the theory of evolution was concieved by a pompas fool who had been offended by something in Christianity and wanted to think of something to back up his new found hatred of Christianity.
2007-02-10 17:02:31 · answer #10 · answered by Joseph 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋