English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave the name Ishmael to the son she had borne. (from Genesis 16)

From Genesis 21:
(Sarah) said to Abraham, "Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that slave woman's son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac." The matter distressed Abraham greatly because it concerned his son. But God said to him, "Do not be so distressed about the boy and your maidservant. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned. I WILL MAKE THE SON OF THE MAIDSERVANT INTO A NATION ALSO, BECAUSE HE IS YOUR OFFSPRING."...

...(In the desert) God heard the boy crying, and the angel of God called to Hagar from heaven and said to her, "What is the matter, Hagar? Do not be afraid; God has heard the boy crying as he lies there. Lift the boy up and take him by the hand, for I WILL MAKE HIM INTO A GREAT NATION." (emphasis added)

What's all this about?

2007-02-10 04:41:49 · 8 answers · asked by NHBaritone 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

Vatican has already admitted that the story of Ishmael was altered

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/__PN.HTM

2 Placing the child on her back: the phrase is translated from an emended form of the Hebrew text. In the current faulty Hebrew text, Abraham put the bread and the waterskin on Hagar's back, while her son apparently walked beside her. This reading seems to be a scribal attempt at harmonizing the present passage with the data of the Priestly source, in which Ishmael would have been at least fourteen years old when Isaac was born; compare ? Genesis 16:16 with ? Genesis 21:5; cf ? Genesis 17:25. But in the present Elohist story Ishmael is obviously a little boy, not much older than Isaac; cf ? Genesis 15:18.

Source(s):

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/__PN.HTM

2007-02-10 04:50:18 · answer #1 · answered by Kimo 4 · 1 2

Abraham and Sarah were basically trying to help God out by substituting Sarah's handmaid, Hagar, for Sarah (because she was really old and seemingly barren). However, God wanted to fulfill his promise to Abraham through Sarah. On the other hand, He wasn't going to punish the handmaiden and her son for Abraham's unbelief, so He gave them a beautiful promise, too.

As a Christian, I think that God did just as He said He would. The Muslims ARE a great nation.

2007-02-10 04:46:56 · answer #2 · answered by WithUnveiledFaces 3 · 2 0

Ishmael became ruler of a large tribe or nation. The Ishmaelites were nomads living in the wilderness of Sinai and Paran, south of Israel. One of Ishmael's daughters married Esau, Ishmael's nephew (28:9). The Bible pictures the Ishmaelites as hostile to Israel and to God (Psalm 83:5-6).

2007-02-10 05:12:47 · answer #3 · answered by Freedom 7 · 0 0

Ishmael was the result of Abram not waiting on GOD. The descendants of Ishmael are a great nation today. I am afraid I can't see many more layers then that. Am I missing something?

2007-02-10 04:48:15 · answer #4 · answered by Bye Bye 6 · 1 0

This is a story of trusting God to keep His promises. Of man's way which has lead to hate and war and God way that would bring the Christ into the world to redeem mankind. Even the great Abraham had trouble waiting on God and had to do things his own way. Look at the mess he created for the world trying to "help" God keep His promises... Jim

2007-02-10 04:49:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It has many connotations in Biblical times. Theologians of Old Testament history have traced many of Israels enemies in the Old Testament back to Ishmael. And there are those who have traced this to current nations.

2007-02-10 04:48:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

What is your question? YHVH wanted a people to praise His name and receive His blessings. Most refused, but He promised to bless many other people anyway, even though they refused to accept His righteousness. Hence we see the great blessings the Muslims have received. Oil, etc.

2007-02-10 04:46:49 · answer #7 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 1 1

Allah God is no respector of persons. And He wants all human beings to love each other in this way. Please read this information patiently!
What in the world is the difference between loving a person and being attached to them ?
Love is the sincere wish for others to be happy, and to be free from suffering.
Having realistically recognized others' kindness as well as their faults, love is always focused on the other persons welfare. We have No ulterior motives to fulfill our self-interest, or to fulfill our desires; to love others simply because they exist. Attachment, on the other hand, exaggerates others' good qualities and makes us crave to be with them. When we're with them, we're happy, but when we're separated from them, we are often miserable. Attachment is linked with expectations of what others should be or do.
Is love as it is usually understood in our society really love OR a false attachment ? Let us examine this a bit more. Generally we are attracted to people either because they have qualities we value or because they help us in some way. If we observe our own thought processes mindfully, and carefully - we'll notice that we look for specific qualities in others. Some of these qualities we find attractive, others are those our parents, or society value. We examine someone's looks, body, education, financial situation, social status. This is how most of us decide on whether or not the person holds any true value to us.
In addition, we judge people as worthwhile according to how they relate to us. If they help us, praise us, make us feel secure, listen to what we have to say, care for us when we are sick or depressed, we consider them good people, and it is this type of people we are most likely to be more attracted to.
But this is very biased, for we judge them only in terms of how they relate to "us", as if we are the most important person in the world. After we've judged certain people to be good for us, whenever we see them it appears to us as if goodness is coming from them, but if we are more aware, we recognize that we have projected this goodness onto them.
Desiring to be with the people a lot who make us feel good, we become emotional yo-yo's -
when we're with these people, we're Up, when we're not with these people, we're Down.
Furthermore, we form fixed concepts of what our relationships with those people will be and thus have expectations of them. When they do not live up to our expectations of them, we're very disappointed, or may become angry !
We want them to change so that they will they will match what we think they are. But our projections and expectations come from our own minds, not from the other people.
Our problems arise not because others aren't
who we thought they we're, but because we mistakenly thought they were something they
aren't.
Checklist: "I Love You if __________ "
What we call love is most often attachment.
It is actually a disturbing attitude that overestimates the qualities of another person.
We then cling to tightly to that person, thinking our happiness depends on that person.
"Love, on the other hand, is an open and very calm, relaxed attitude. We want someone to be happy, and free from suffering simply because they exist. While attachment is uncontrolled and much too sentimental, Love is direct and powerful. Attachment obscures our judgment and we become impatient, angry, and impartial, helping only our dear one's and harming those who we don't like. Love builds up others, and clarifies our minds, and we access a situation by thinking of the greatest good for everyone. Attachment is based on selfishness, while Love is founded upon cherishing others, even those who do not look very appealing to the eyes. Love looks beyond all the superficial appearances, and dwells on the fact that they are just like us: they want inner peace, happiness, and want to avoid suffering. If we see unattractive, dirty, ignorant people, we feel repulsed because our selfish minds want to know attractive, intellectual, clean, and talented people. Love, on the other hand, never evaluates others by these superficial standards and looks much deeper into the person. Love recognizes that regardless of the others' appearances, their experience is the same as ours: they seek inner peace, to be happy, to be free from sufferings, and to do their best to avoid problems.
When we're attached, we're not mentally and emotionally free. We overly depend on and cling to another person to fulfill our mental and especially our emotional needs. We fear losing the person, feeling we'd be incomplete without him. This does not mean that we should suppress our emotional needs or become aloof, alone and totally independent, for that too does not solve the problem. We must simply realize our unrealistic needs, and slowly seek to eliminate them. Some emotional needs may be so strong that they can't be dissolved immediately. If we try to suppress them or pretend they do not exist, we become anxious, insecure, falling into a depression. In this case, we can do our best to fulfill our needs while simultaneously working gradually to subdue them.
"The core problem is we seek to be loved, rather than to love. We yearn to be understood by others rather than to understand them. In all honesty, our sense of emotional insecurities comes from the selfishness obscuring our own minds. 'We can develop self-confidence by recognizing our inner potential to become a selfless human being with many, many magnificent qualities, then we'll develop a true and accurate feeling of self-confidence. And then we'll seek to increase true love, without attachments, to increase compassion, to cultivate patience and understanding, as well as generosity, concentration and wisdom.'
'Under the influence of attachment we're bound by our emotional reactions to others. When they are nice to us, we're happy. When they ignore us, or speak sharply to us, we take it personally and are unhappy. But pacifying attachment doesn't mean we become hard-hearted. Rather, without attachment there will be space in our hearts and minds for genuine Affection and Impartial Love for them.
We'll be actively involved with them. If we learn to subdue our attachments, we can most definitely have successful friendships and personal relationships with others !! These relationships will be richer because of the freedom and respect - the relationships will be based on. We'll care about the happiness and the misery of all human beings equally, simply because everyone is the same in wanting and needing inner peace, happiness, and not wanting to suffer. However, our lifestyles and interests may be more compatible with those of some people more so than with others, and that is alright. In any case, our relationships will be based on mutual Love, mutual interests, and the wish to help each other in life.

2007-02-10 05:00:30 · answer #8 · answered by Thomas 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers