2007-02-09 23:56:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I guess some people don't get my question. If my picture was a little bigger you'd see it was a picture of monkey with a MAN'S face.
2007-02-10 00:19:27 · update #1
To birdsflie - Chill out dude. It's okay really. I'm sure you're making a good point. I'll have to check out that verse. Who cares who gives you thumbs down.
2007-02-10 00:22:09 · update #2
To Brenden G - You don't know me, do you? lol I'm not at all a creationalist even though I'm a Christian. And I'm also not ....... a man.
2007-02-10 10:05:52 · update #3
I, personaly, was always convincet it was Pete Doherty.
2007-02-10 00:01:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I know where the missing link was at, but none of you all will not believe it if I tell you, Let me see how many thumbs down I get. In Gen. 3:14 we see God cursing that missing link into the reptile family, That serpent was to be a worker for Adam Until God cursed the serpent in Gen. 3:14 & not before Gen. 3:14 did that serpent become a snake, But he became a reptile after the curse. Before the curse he was a upright creature, The highest form of the animal kingdom, But he was not a Son of God & neither did he have a soul. Now let's see all the thumbs down, Hey, Look at Gen. 3:14 yourself, It tells you what God did to that serpent, Then come back & see what you think. Even a 7 year old can understand that verse. Don't tell me a 7 year old knows more than you all do.
2007-02-10 00:09:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Which would that be? There was never A missing link. That is a misconception - there were gaps in the evolutionary tree that had yet to be discovered but the earth is a big place.
Or are you talking about the new evidence that cromagnon man interbred with neanderthal and so there never was a missing part on that branch they just bred each other out.
Or are you claiming its you?
2007-02-10 00:03:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
...Yes, it was in a recent National Enquirer (or was it Weekly World News?). (Note - These publications are every bit as trustworthy as the New York Times).
...I saw the article as I was paying for my shredded wheat at the grocery store. The expert artist's conception of the creature resembled a combination of Hulk Hogan, Andre the Giant, and Barney Fife. Carbon dating, of course, gave the approximate time when it appeared (but it didn't exactly match the year that Don Knotts was born).
2007-02-10 00:05:57 · answer #4 · answered by carson123 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
many many many missing links have been found.
the missing link refers to a species previously unknown, that is found to bridge the 'evolutionary gap' between two previously known species.
the missing link is not a caveman, like popular culture seems to suggest. there is a very good book on the market about this called:
top ten myths about the theory of evolution.
2007-02-10 00:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by mrzwink 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
LOL at "missing link".
I imagine that the U.S. is full of creationists who honestly believe that evolutionary scientists are busy at work desperately looking for a "missing link" in order to prove evolution.
Those creationists are a bunch of ignorant saps with absolutely no clue how the world works. It's absolutely mind-boggling that people can be so utterly freaking stupid as to believe that creationist propaganda.
2007-02-10 00:16:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Impossible. When you find a bone in the dirt, all you have is bone. Anything other than that is Artist Conception. You cannot tell the color of it's skin, whether it was warm or cold blooded, the muscle mass. Other than the bone , it is made up!
2007-02-10 00:41:29 · answer #7 · answered by michael m 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Consider this. If all kinds of things could interbreed to form new kinds, then we would not have the hundreds of different "breeds" of birds (for example). If two robins gave birth to a new kind of bird it would die a lonely death. You don't need to find one missing link (unless it is the missing link in your thought processes.) You need to find millions!
2007-02-10 00:00:44 · answer #8 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
another creationist who doesn't understand the difference between a monkey and an ape.
and yet, somehow he's evolved to level 6!
2007-02-10 00:32:03 · answer #9 · answered by Brendan G 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is about the number fifty on the list of missing links. The only trouble is the other 49 turned out after more research to be nothing of the kind.
2007-02-10 00:03:09 · answer #10 · answered by mark g 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
There is no missing link.
2007-02-10 00:19:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋