since the baby defends itself against the attack of the abortion? Doesn't that require individuality, the defense of the unborn against the mothers act to end it implies two wills at odds, not one will?
2007-02-09 12:49:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Your only going to get a bunch of answers telling you to retake elementary biology, from the pro-lifers. It can't just be a part of the mother it has its very own unique DNA and electrical signature. The difference is only in location and development, just as I was once an adolescent, I was also once a fetus, all human. Need to get over the idea that a baby is a disease that needs to be cured.
2007-02-09 12:54:09 · answer #1 · answered by HAND 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This is so true! Even physically the baby is not part of the mother.
2007-02-09 12:54:19 · answer #2 · answered by RB 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If a baby defends itself it is living thing, and thus should be destroyed immediately.
2007-02-09 12:55:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why do people insist on talking about abortion as a religious issue, it isn't.
2007-02-09 12:52:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, you are so right.It is so horrific to murder a baby.
2007-02-09 12:58:08 · answer #5 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is not a baby and it does not defend itself. Get a grip!!!!!!!!!!
2007-02-09 12:57:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
B/c the baby isn't alive until the 24-26 week... it has to be aborted before/at/around four months. Duh.
2007-02-09 12:59:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Simple. There is no baby involved, just an fetus.
2007-02-09 12:52:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Everyone is part of everything
2007-02-09 12:53:46 · answer #9 · answered by Troy G 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋