English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In most cases, sanitation has taken care of the risk factors for many of these rare and many times,not fatal diseases.

But how heavily weighed are the side effects and odds of getting any number of permanent disability from so many vaccines introduced to infants at such an early age?

Are corporations really setting the standards and forcing the laws, being more of a case for money and not proven health benefits?

And where is there protection for the children for the hundreds of other diseases and conditions children can contract?
Where will it reach a point of ridiculous when hundreds of vaccines are forced on children before they enter school, effectively making the certain vaccines more likely a hazard than the uncertain illness?

2007-02-09 11:15:27 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

17 answers

I prefer it how it is. Young infants are at risk for being exposed, so they benefit with vaccinations.

2007-02-09 11:19:18 · answer #1 · answered by HeartOfGlass 4 · 1 1

Most vaccines for routine pediatric use in the US no longer contain thimerosal, even though decades of study on hundreds of thousands of patients has found no link between thimerosal and, say, autism.

Further, a child's immune system encounters literally thousands of challenges every single day. Vaccines don't really add to the load.

The health benefits of vaccines are proven beyond a doubt. And outbreaks of measles, mumps, and even polio pop up wherever populations are unprotected (yes, here in the US, too). That line about how sanitation has taken care of vaccine-preventable diseases is just, frankly, not true.

Vaccines are not linked to "any number of permanent disabilities"--read the prescribing information for physicians, and you'll see that. Plus, safety data is available from the CDC.

Further, the federal government DOES provide for children injured by vaccines, if the harm can be proven.

2007-02-09 11:30:05 · answer #2 · answered by Yarro Pilz 6 · 0 2

Binary options let users trade in currency pairs and stocks for various predetermined time-periods, minimal of which is 30 seconds. Executing trades is straightforward. The system uses user-friendly interfaces, which even an 8 years old kid, can operate without having to read any instructions. But winning trades is Not easy.
Binary trading is advertised as the only genuine system that lets users earn preposterous amounts of money in ridiculously short period of time. Advertisers try to implicate as if you can make $350 every 60 seconds; if it was true then binary trading would truly be an astonishing business.
However, does it make any sense? Can every trader make tons of money in binary trading? Who is actually paying all the money or the profit to traders?
The first challenge is finding a trustworthy binary broker; secondly, you need to find a binary trading strategy, which you can use to make profits consistently. Without an effective trading strategy, there is no way you can make money in this business.
Learning a profitable trading strategy is possible, You should watch this presentation video https://tr.im/16635
It's probably the best way to learn how to win with binary option

2015-01-24 10:14:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yarrow Pilz:

You must see a consistency dilemma in your statement if you say that both: there is no side effects and
there is a vaccination injury database and benefit program.

That is the kind double speak evident of a lie that the medical community continually perpetuates.

Why is there an adverse warning label inside the vaccine box, as it is a drug, with it's own set of special harmful effects?

2007-02-09 11:54:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Caution! I kept my dog at a kennel for a little while, and it was my first time so I just trusted the emplyoes. Insist on seeing the actual area your dog will be in. Make all the decisions. Don't be intimidated by the staff. Don't let them tell you 'it's employes only' even if they say it's for your own safety. DON'T leave your dog there then. Mine had been sitting in it's own crap for hours at a time, had to pee like crazy when i took her out and crapped five times in an hour. They also feed cheap foods, so insist on having them feed food you leave for them. Insist on having the dogs next to each other so they know they are together, because being in this environtment is VERY stressful for a dog. People highly underestimate that. Dogs focus on their territory, they will be in a strange place with lots of crying dogs and strange people, so make sure you make it as homey and loving as possible and naturally as SHORT a stay as possible. Sorry, just learned from experience. My dog left terrified.

2016-05-24 18:33:35 · answer #5 · answered by Johnna 4 · 0 0

I think it's fine the way it is. they do the vaccines before school for a reason becuase they are around so many other children and that's how they get the diseases there are more pros than cons. the same thing can happen to a toddler as an infant

2007-02-09 11:20:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I'd rather vaccinate my child as an infant than wait a year or two and find out that by some fluke they've caught something that could have been prevented. It's the same reason I insisted they get flu shots back in October --- and now that 3 local children have died EVERYONE is trying to get a flu shot. I'd rather be safe when it's something that easy!

2007-02-09 11:20:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

As a parent you ultimately have the choice when to or not to vaccinate your children...if you want to wait until they are older wait...if you don't want to vaccinate then don't. We were never vaccinated and never had a problem...but a friend of ours vaccinated their first child and she had such a high fever from the shots that she ended up deaf.

2007-02-09 11:24:17 · answer #8 · answered by creative rae 4 · 3 0

The risks far outweigh the benifits - I think it should be left the way it is!! Why mess with something thats been working fine for such a long time!!!!

2007-02-09 11:20:05 · answer #9 · answered by bec 5 · 1 0

I'm okay with the way things are now.

Plus, I'd certainly like to see a list of "hundreds" of other diseases a child can get...and you can only list cold or flu once not multiple times for each possible mutation.

2007-02-09 11:18:00 · answer #10 · answered by Heather Y 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers