prison who have embraced the christian faith, and will therefore, (assuming there is a heaven/hell), be sharing a place in heaven.Wouldn't you rather be sharing a place in hell with Darwin ?
2007-02-09 11:00:42 · 16 answers · asked by jennybuttins 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
So we are all free then to go off murdering/rapeing or simply living our sinfull lives, as long as like the afore mentioned prisoners, we repent before we die ?
2007-02-09 11:37:45 · update #1
i"d love to be there so I could hang out with Lenny Bruce, Richard Prior, Lord Buckley, w.s. burroughs, jimmy hendrix, jack the ripper, aleister crowley, Judas and other luminaries of their ilk.
2007-02-09 11:09:11 · answer #1 · answered by ancientcityentertainment 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you have a right to your own opinion no matter how idiotic and ludacris it might be put it like this #1 mans thoughts are not like gods thought so you review thing with a minute perception of what it could be. 2ndly the best trick the devil ever pulled was to make you believe that he doesnt exist that way theres no consequences for the wrong you do youll live forever he said to eve so continue on your path of destruction knowing full well hell awaits you actually i cant even say that because i dont have a heaven or hell to offer to anyone my opinion is nuthin read your bible and pray for the answer genius
2007-02-09 11:22:06 · answer #2 · answered by Lemriel L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are in prison suffering for the crimes they committed. It descent matter if they have accepted some fantasy savior. They only do that because they are afraid their fantasy boogie man Satan will jump up and take a bite of their butt. Their life is miserable as it should be. I will neither be sharing a place in heave with them or a place in hell with Darwin. And neither will they. Upon death Darwin's suffering was over as will be everyone.
2007-02-09 11:03:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe in Hell. But I do see your point. If I did, in fact believe in hell, and people who simply refused to convert went there, I would rather be with them than those violent, murderous folk in heaven.
2007-02-09 11:09:56 · answer #4 · answered by Je veux changer le monde 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah. In heaven, with God, is better...no matter what kind of company there will be. All bad will be gone there, so Dahmer and I will be on the same playing field.
Rejecting a place in heaven because there are "bad" people there is like not coming to your own wedding because you can't stand your cousins.
2007-02-09 11:18:08 · answer #5 · answered by WithUnveiledFaces 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's genuinely unconstitutional, and not in any respect something more effective than an attempt to coerce conversions on the area of the lawmakers and church homes in touch. there is little or no connection between non secular faith and failure to commit crimes, depending on the range of persons in penitentiary with an exquisite good faith in God. apart from, the actual shown actuality that there are a constrained type of church homes in touch leaves many human beings devoid of innovations suitable to their beliefs (or lack thereof) -- and that i heavily doubt the lawmakers who pushed this via may settle for a Wiccan coven if the type of collection volunteered. I seem to remember as well that the regulation mandated church attendance on *Sundays*, which de facto excludes any faith whose worship facilities are hung on a diverse day (Judaism, each person?). to assert not something of atheists being stuck devoid of an option in any respect. regardless of all that, nonetheless, the authorities ought to not be interior the business enterprise of attempting to emphasise, coerce, or encourage human beings to attend any certain church homes, or perhaps non secular facilities commonly. And even as your purely innovations are church or penitentiary, definite, that is coercion. in the experience that they prefer to attempt something that is both Constitutionally-sound and surely effective, then possibly they ought to institute some type of treatment or counseling application instead to penitentiary -- secular, and surely suitable to the topics they try to handle. I agree that the judicial gadget interior the US is way too concentrated on punishment and not in any respect almost worried sufficient with rehabilitation, yet that's the incorrect thanks to flow about it.
2016-11-26 20:12:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read a news story back in the fall about a minister who claims to have who baptized Jeffrey Dahmer and witnessed his conversion to Christianity, shortly before he was murdered by another convict.
That's when I made up my mind that I'm not going to heaven, not even if I get an engraved invitation. :)
2007-02-09 11:12:09 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am proud to have my body someday decompose and migle with the dust of Charles Darwin (and Jim Darwin too for that matter).
2007-02-09 11:04:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand this at all....the Christian concept of Heaven sounds a lot like hell to me.
2007-02-09 11:04:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
who says darwin is in hell> I can't judge. ALL of us have SINNED, not just those in jail, we all deserve hell, but if we ask for forgiveness, we have a chance of going to heaven.
2007-02-09 11:07:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋