If your question is the basis for my decision, I would rather have the best trained protecting me. No use having cutting edge technology if the operator is poorly trained.
I am not saying Americans are poorly trained, just answering using your question and what it states.
2007-02-09 10:13:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by John B 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither, I'd Rather have Israel's Army because they are constantly under Combat Situations and Warfare is a regular sight for some Israeli's but, with all the conflicts we've been in I'd take the US Marines anyday staying on the battlefront 8 Months at a Time and with only around 3,000 KIA since the War Started compared to (possibly) 100,000 Insurgents look at the kill ratio..
2007-02-09 10:32:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by eli 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
US. The US has been in action constantly in some part of the world since 1991. The are right now the best equipped and best experienced in the world.
2007-02-09 11:42:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The British it doesn't matter if you have the biggest gun but if you don't have the training to use it correctly then it is useless
2007-02-09 11:24:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by molly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Id trust Ireland cuz its the best country in the world woohooo rock on Ireland!!!!
2007-02-09 10:10:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
well i dont know how british are trained, but i believe they are trianed well. i also know Americans are also trained very well, they also learn respect,God, honor, country and much more.
2007-02-09 10:51:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why not have the two fight and see who wins?
2007-02-09 10:14:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by loon_mallet_wielder 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
americans because they have nukes
2007-02-09 10:14:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋