English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i was told that there was a new law in California about having your dogs on a leash for more that 3hrs. u get fined! i need some help and finding out whether it is true. i never keep my dogs on a leash but i need to find out...just incase i ever need to keep on a leash for a while

2007-02-09 08:43:02 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets Dogs

i was told that there was a new law in California Los Angeles County about having your dogs on a leash for more that 3hrs. u get fined! i need some help and finding out whether it is true. i never keep my dogs on a leash but i need to find out...just incase i ever need to keep on a leash for a while

2007-02-09 08:55:09 · update #1

LOS ANGELES COUNTY???

2007-02-09 08:55:38 · update #2

7 answers

While it very well maybe a law, it's going to be hard to enforce. What is the cop going to do? Stand there for 3 hours to see if your dog is on leash the whole time?

2007-02-09 08:47:31 · answer #1 · answered by BUCK_ID 2 · 0 1

Found this online:
Mono County Animal Control would like to advise all dog owners and caretakers in the County that the State of California has enacted a law restricting the "tethering" of dogs. The new law, which takes effect January 1, 2007, makes it illegal for a person to "tether, fasten, chain, tie, or restrain a dog … to a dog house, tree, fence, or any other stationary object."

Also, the law allows a person to tether a dog for a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed 3 hours in a 24-hour period

2007-02-09 08:48:11 · answer #2 · answered by sportsluvr209 3 · 2 0

you're incorrect. count number should be CREATED. It takes position for all time. it really is pronounced as the 0 element Fluctuation. the particular potential of a random element in area can not be universal, so it can not be 0. ( If it were 0 then it should be universal ) consequently, count number and anti-count number pairs are coalescing out of "empty" area for all time. usually, those debris annihilate one yet another and the technique repeats. the perfect result's that any arbitrary area of area has 0 internet potential. The universe is only a similar. This technique of debris getting into existence befell, regardless of the indisputable fact that the technique, by using random version, did not opposite. Inflation befell because the outcome of an element shift and the universe and the area it inhabits prolonged straight away from, truly, not something. Now the following is the loose Lunch. the completed area encompassing our universe incorporates 0 internet potential. As such, it violates NO universal guidelines. [edit] MARTIN S: before each thing, there grow to be NO SINGULARITY. the massive Bang grow to be an explosion of area besides as count number. a million) The rigidity of dispersion per chance 50 cases better than G. regardless of the indisputable fact that the EM rigidity is trillions of cases better, regardless of the indisputable fact that, positioned a huge adequate mass jointly and the cumulative results of gravity can triumph over the different rigidity. Gravity is a one-way street, it in hardship-free words attracts. 2) have you ever considered collisions? 3) The guidelines of Thermodynamics do not practice the following as i have defined. 4) clarify the way you understand that God isn't subject to the guidelines of physics. are you able to grant some substance to study? [edit] Craig B: at the same time as Stephen Hawking mentions the "ideas of God", he's speaking peotically. He wouldn't have a perception in a own god, yet in a idea of unity of the guidelines of physics revealed contained in the language of mathematics. Stephen Hawking made the declare, in "a short historic past of Time", that if his "no-boundary cosmology" grow to be maximum ideas-blowing then there should be no decide on for a author.

2016-12-03 23:17:52 · answer #3 · answered by rieck 4 · 0 0

I don't think the law was passed saying you can't keep your dog on a leash, but saying that ppl can't get a dog then tie them up in a yard for their whole life.

ppl will chain a dog up to a tree in the back yard and forget about them. Its cruel to have a dog tied up all the time so i think this law is meant to deter ppl from doing that.

2007-02-09 08:53:13 · answer #4 · answered by Learn2LoveMe 4 · 1 0

Yup! You all should be FIGHTING these stupid anti-dog laws before your state is completely ruined by the animal 'rights' groups!!!

3 hours, in a 24 hour period. What a bunch of idiots! Guess they think its better if they wander around freely, making more mutt puppies and attacking people.

Idiots.

2007-02-09 16:10:04 · answer #5 · answered by whpptwmn 5 · 0 0

I think that means tying a dog up not walking him on a leash.

2007-02-09 08:54:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I couldn't find anything. Call your local town hall and ask.

2007-02-09 08:52:46 · answer #7 · answered by GSDJunkie 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers