That's right - Gregor Mendel fudged his numbers. But at least he fudged them in the right direction.
2007-02-09 06:26:29 · 12 answers · asked by mullah robertson 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It's good to read books, isn't it?
2007-02-09 06:28:44 · answer #1 · answered by Love Shepherd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah. Of course, anyone who reads books knows that he understood statistics very well. The public in his time believed that if things didn't happen precisely as theory predicts that the results were not proof at all. He agonized very much over that because he wanted to educate the public as to the true nature of God's creation, but if he reported his statistics exactly they would believe a lie. I'm not sure what I would have done, but I sure do understand him. Christians feel a greater need to teach people the truth.
2007-02-09 08:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sara, you do the large mistake, like many Atheists, of not studying in context and not in any respect studying interior the awareness of the large photo. Atheists declare "good judgment and reason" yet yet they fail miserably each and anytime in this uncomplicated element. If we examine the regulation in Exodus 12:21 (which by technique of how became written about 3300 years in the past) we stumble on God holding to the Israelites that the Israelite elders were to kill the Passover lambs. It did not say God may in my opinion kill the Passover lambs Himself, or that Pharaoh ought to do it, or that devil may do it, although the Jewish elders. The Jewish elders needed Yahshua (Jesus) useless, they were given Romans to arrest Him, and then had Him presented earlier Pilate. Matthew 27:a million-20 confirms the Jewish elders requested Pilate for Yahshua (the Passover Lamb) to be killed even as Barabbas launched. So how are the Romans in touch? All they did became carry out the execution, even though it became the Jewish elders who needed Yahshua useless, it became them who had Him killed.
2016-11-26 19:37:46 · answer #3 · answered by buckingham 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What about the Catholic church going against Galileo? People have always been wrong but God's word is eternal and always right. What about Matthew Maury? In 1825 he read Pslam 8, and read that there was ocean currents under the ocean, he wanted to know, he found them, and started oceanography!
2007-02-09 06:33:23 · answer #4 · answered by yaabro 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, must you bag on the father of modern genetics?
Piltdown man hoax was also the work of a Christian. So was the photgraphs of the Loch Ness Monster - both confessed their sins on their deathbeds.
2007-02-09 06:29:41 · answer #5 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whatever dude. A simple search through wikipedia says that his numbers were not fudged. It's the inherit fault of samples, you need to randomize your samples.
You're full of S H I T, towel head.
2007-02-09 06:33:22 · answer #6 · answered by wonderwhy2100 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did you know that, until the last 150 years or so, almost all scientific advancement was made under the auspices of the Church?
2007-02-09 06:30:40 · answer #7 · answered by mzJakes 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Scientifically there is a "right way" to cheat on research? Jim
2007-02-09 06:29:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I heard that. Well he must have figured it out without the tight empirical evidence he reported, which is something in itself.
2007-02-09 06:29:42 · answer #9 · answered by rcpeabody1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i did not, but this is very funny.
thanks for letting me know this. i guess god was on his side, helping him out with the fudging and all
2007-02-09 06:29:04 · answer #10 · answered by Shellular Kellular 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The biggest scientific fraud in history is the so-called theory of evolution.
2007-02-09 06:33:58 · answer #11 · answered by A.M.D.G 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋