English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Also, they build Haram al-Sharif on the Temple Mount, which is the holiest site in Judaism, and Jewish Israelis do not try to tear down the Dome of the Rock. They wanted to install a ramp. With my Christian tendencies, you'd think I'd be offended to, but I am not. I understand. They are not touching the Dome of the Rock. It is an archaeological restoration and set of improvements needed. They will risk hurting POLICE OFFICERS doing their job?

2007-02-09 05:41:41 · 7 answers · asked by wife of Ali Pasha 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

No one and nothing gives people the right to hurl stones at anyone. It's their ignorance and their hatred that makes them do that. I just pray for those people to find GOD and change their ways. Thank you and GOD bless.

2007-02-09 05:46:50 · answer #1 · answered by cookie 6 · 1 1

police take care of the regulation and the regulation protects the accountable from the harmless . sorry certainty of existence . yet concept history that's a hassle-free putting . and to think approximately that the two are based on the Roman ideal of one to steer all . yet fortunate for the greater effective human beings . we've human beings which incorporate 401: Alaric king of the visigoths penetrates in Italy 405: The Ostrogoths and different german tribes flow the Danube and the Alps heading to Italy yet they the place destroyed via the romans close to Florence 406: Menaced via the Huns, the Vandals, suaves, burgundies and Alans flow the Rhine river 408: The Visigoths penetrate in Italy, the place they siege the emperor in Ravenna 409: Suaves, Vandals and Alans invade Spain 410: The Visigoths with help of a few ostrogoths sack Rome 411: The Visigoths march via France 412: The Visigoths Settle in southern France 415: The Visigoths triumph over Aquitania 422: The Vandals march to southern Spain 428: The Vandals march to North Africa to help its governor 431: The Vandals triumph over North Africa 435: The romans sign a treaty with the Vandals accepting them as federated in North Africa 436: Aecio organizes the Gaul establishing the French interior the north, the Alamans interior the south and the Burgundies interior the lands surrounding the Rhode river 439: The romans flow away Britain. The Vandals insurrection and take Carthage 451: The Huns invade Gaul yet are defeated in Campos Catalaunicos 452: The Huns regroup and invade Italy however the pope confident them to no longer sack Rome 455: The Vandals attack Sicily and different isles, and sack Rome 461: The Visigoths set up their hegemony interior the Gaul 465: Vandal rule interior the Mediterranean they attack Greece, Epirus and Ilyria 471: Burgundy advance 474: The Vandals sign a peace treaty 476: The germanic troops in Italy insurrection and declare Odoacro as king of Italy. end of the western roman empire

2016-12-17 06:07:13 · answer #2 · answered by erke 4 · 0 0

There's alot of anger, hurt, and misunderstandings going on over there. It doesn't give anyone a right to hurt anybody, but when people feel that things are hopeless for them, and that everyone is against them, they lash out. It's bad over there. It's very sad.

2007-02-09 05:48:47 · answer #3 · answered by Rosalind S 4 · 1 0

Well maybe if the Zionists would let the Muslims pray in our scared mosque and get out of our country we wouldn't have this problem. They have every right to act any way they want to against the occupiers. I agree it's not touching the mosque however I imagine my Palestinians brothers and sisters don't want Jews going past our mosque.

2007-02-09 05:47:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

there is no palestine....never was
________________________
The term "Palestine" is believed to be derived from the Philistines, an Aegean people who, in the 12th Century B.C.E., settled along the Mediterranean coastal plain of what are now Israel and the Gaza Strip. In the second century C.E., after crushing the last Jewish revolt, the Romans first applied the name Palaestina to Judea (the southern portion of what is now called the West Bank) in an attempt to minimize Jewish identification with the land of Israel. The Arabic word "Filastin" is derived from this Latin name.3

The Hebrews entered the Land of Israel about 1300 B.C.E., living under a tribal confederation until being united under the first monarch, King Saul. The second king, David, established Jerusalem as the capital around 1000 B.C.E. David's son, Solomon built the Temple soon thereafter and consolidated the military, administrative and religious functions of the kingdom. The nation was divided under Solomon's son, with the northern kingdom (Israel) lasting until 722 B.C.E., when the Assyrians destroyed it, and the southern kingdom (Judah) surviving until the Babylonian conquest in 586 B.C.E. The Jewish people enjoyed brief periods of sovereignty afterward before most Jews were finally driven from their homeland in 135 C.E.

Jewish independence in the Land of Israel lasted for more than 400 years. This is much longer than Americans have enjoyed independence in what has become known as the United States.4 In fact, if not for foreign conquerors, Israel would be 3,000 years old today.

Palestine was never an exclusively Arab country, although Arabic gradually became the language of most the population after the Muslim invasions of the seventh century. No independent Arab or Palestinian state ever existed in Palestine. When the distinguished Arab-American historian, Princeton University Prof. Philip Hitti, testified against partition before the Anglo-American Committee in 1946, he said: "There is no such thing as 'Palestine' in history, absolutely not."5

Prior to partition, Palestinian Arabs did not view themselves as having a separate identity. When the First Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations met in Jerusalem in February 1919 to choose Palestinian representatives for the Paris Peace Conference, the following resolution was adopted:

We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds.6

In 1937, a local Arab leader, Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi, told the Peel Commission, which ultimately suggested the partition of Palestine: "There is no such country [as Palestine]! 'Palestine' is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria."7

The representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the United Nations submitted a statement to the General Assembly in May 1947 that said "Palestine was part of the Province of Syria" and that, "politically, the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity." A few years later, Ahmed Shuqeiri, later the chairman of the PLO, told the Security Council: "It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria."8

Palestinian Arab nationalism is largely a post-World War I phenomenon that did not become a significant political movement until after the 1967 Six-Day War and Israel's capture of the West Bank.

2007-02-09 05:46:30 · answer #5 · answered by Robert K 5 · 0 4

what gives the Israelis the right to occupy Palestine??

2007-02-09 05:48:28 · answer #6 · answered by Dirty 5 · 1 1

So, what else is new? Its the nature of the beast.

2007-02-09 06:24:22 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers