English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Don't see it happening. No one will be willing to pay for it. Plus, at a certain point, one has to learn how to educate himself instead of relying on an educational system.


XR

2007-02-09 03:58:05 · answer #1 · answered by XReader 5 · 0 0

Hopefully children will go to school until they graduate and learn the difference between they're and there.

2007-02-09 03:54:40 · answer #2 · answered by purple 2 · 3 0

18 year olds aren't children.

2007-02-09 03:50:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You have to go to school until your 16. Just kinda hard to find a job that will support you if you don't at least finish high school.

2007-02-09 22:44:17 · answer #4 · answered by Jake W 3 · 0 0

If any child is 16 years of age, that child does not have to attend school

2007-02-09 03:56:47 · answer #5 · answered by nodrod2000@Yahoo.com 1 · 0 1

There are plans to move compulsory education up to 18. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

And it's 'They're' not 'there'.

2007-02-09 03:53:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Depends if they're still in primary education at that age. Then yes!

2007-02-09 03:54:41 · answer #7 · answered by howardlee1977 4 · 0 0

until they're 18 according to a government report...That's if you can believe them

2007-02-09 03:58:22 · answer #8 · answered by . 6 · 0 0

If they want to... they are considered adults at this point.... it's called post-secondary education.

2007-02-09 03:53:24 · answer #9 · answered by naenae0011 7 · 0 0

You should, it might improve you're spelling (their, dear) not "there".

2007-02-09 07:58:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers