Only those who have not studied it, and those who do not have the Holy Spirit to help them see the truth.
There is plenty of external evidence that confirms what we read in the bible.
1. Geography
2. Texts
3. Toponymy
4. Archaeology
Geography- If you study the geography of Israel you would see how it affected the settlement patterns, routes of travel commerce, econmy, politics and thus the history of that time. The geography of the Biblical Israel confirms what we read in the Bible.
Texts- There are extra-biblical texts (texts outside the Bible) that also confirm what is written in scripture. Egyptian sources are primarily from the 2nd millenium BCE. There are 4 types.
1) Expedition journal and topographical lists- example is Thutmose III.
2) Literary papyri-example, Journey of Sinuhe
3) Execration texts- 2 sets (ursing)
4) Coorespondance archives- El Amarna letters
Other Extra Biblical texts include Mesopotamian sources, from Syria the Ebla texts, from Transjordan the Mesha Stele, from Israel the Tel Dan inscription.
Also look at authors like the famous historian Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the younger, Julius Africanus, and the Talmud.
Toponymy- the study of place names. If you study the cities and other names in the Bible you will see that they have the Principles of Location which prove they really did exist. Those are:
1) Near a water source.
2) Defensible.
3) Continuity of the name through the centuries.
4) It fits with the geography described in the text.
5) Check data from archaelogical surveys.
No one would settle in a place that did not have these Principles of Location. If you check in the Bible, no one did (unless they were hiding)
Archaeology- If we dig in Israel and find ancient sites that are consistent with where the Bible said we would find them, that shows the Bible's history and geography are accurate. One prominate archaeologist carefully examined Luke's references to 32 countries, 54 cities, and 9 islands, finding not a single mistake. These are only some sites that have been excavated: The Pool of Bethesda in John 5:1-15, the Pool of Siloam from John 9:7, Jacob's well from John 4:12, even Pontius Pilate's identity has been confirmed by archaeology! John McRay PH. D. was asked if he had ever encountered an archaeological finding that blatantly contravene a New Testament reference he responded, "Archaeology has not produced anything that is unequivocally a contradiction to the Bible. On the contrary, there have been many opinions of skeptical scholars that have become codified into 'fact' over the years but that archaeology has shown to be wrong."
2007-02-09 03:23:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by cnm 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why the ignorance of the truth? The bible is what is called "Faction" A fictional story set in a factual time and place. Thus the time, place and real historical characters are all correct but the fictional characters and stories are not! There is not one single mention of Jesus in the entire Roman record - that is right - not one! At the same time as he was supposed to have been around there were a number of Jews claiming to be the messiah - all of whom are well recorded! There is not a single contemporary record from any source and even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death! He was supposed to have been a huge problem to the Romans and produced wonderful miracles but still not one contemporary record? Even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death! Pilate is recorded in the Roman record as a somewhat lack luster man but no mention of a Jesus, a trial or crucifixion that would surely have been used to make him look brighter! At best he was an amalgam of those others but almost certainly never existed! The Roman Emperor Constantine produced the bible and he was a pagan not god! He took the Jewish religion, organized it into Christianity and then into the Holly Roman Catholic Church!! Not in Israel or any of the countries of supposed origin but entirely ITALIAN! Not one word of it is contemporary with the period and was not written until several hundred years after the period the story is set in!! How did the apostles write their books more than a hundred years after they would have been dead? What a wonder full disinformation and deception campaign he waged against his Jewish enemies by turning them into his invented Christianity - so good in fact that Christians are still following the deception to this day! The first person to provide a shred of verifiable evidence for God will become world famous and mega rich as will the first to prove that there was ever a Jesus or that the bible stories have any basis in fact! Ain't happened yet and it never will!
2016-05-24 01:12:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible was written by man. It's fiction. Just another epic trying to describe the advent of society.
2007-02-09 03:34:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by taa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you will find it one of the best history books. Historians have cited the bible for its content of cultural history--early social history. The book has a history. If you choose to deny the philosophy of the bible that's something else.
2007-02-16 13:16:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by j.wisdom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Part fiction, part historical documentary on the life and times of the jewish people.
2007-02-09 03:18:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kallan 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
I don't.
It might not all be the literal truth, but it's not a work of fiction by any stretch of the imagination.
2007-02-09 03:16:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Some of it is fact but it doesn't make it a divine revelation.
2007-02-09 03:19:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Part inspired by God .. Part man work.
2007-02-09 03:24:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kimo 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Its not
2007-02-17 01:45:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by EyeKneadPoints 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say it's a big old load of crap.
2007-02-09 03:20:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by mutterhals 2
·
1⤊
3⤋