Can you show any credible data to support creation theory?

Question

I would like to see any data which can be verified scientifically which could support the Creationist theory. Does such data exist? or do creationists base the belief on the bible. if so how do they know the bible has been correctly translated and is right.
please - no huge rants from the bible as this proves nothing.

Answer 1

You know they can't.

Bible exerpts, quotes out of context, and choosing some scientific facts while leaving out their disproof is not credible data.

Answer 2

"If that is true there should be more living species then existed historically." Nope. As conditions on Earth change, so will the number of species. Sometimes there will be lots of different temperatures and habitats, so lots of species will develop as they will become suited to lots of places. Sometimes there won't, and the Earth will only be able to support a few species in comparison. Also, if a species cannot keep up with the way the world changes and cannot evolve fast enough to survive in the new habitat, it will go extinct. It's a basic failure in your understanding of evolution, so all you need to do is do a little bit more reading. There's a lot of stuff out there- just like there is no reliable evidence for creation. And remember, even if evolution was proved wrong, that doesn't mean Biblical creation (or that of the Quran, or anything else) is the right answer.

Answer 3

Of course they can't.

Not a single paper has been put through for peer review to the scientific journals. Without this (and with NO scientific support) then any data that is presented cannot be taken as credible.

And if you want to test it - look at what is suggested and look for the original sources. I have ALWAYS found that the creationists have misrepresented science.

Answer 4

Look
Probability and Spontaneous Proteins

What chance is there that the correct amino acids would come together to form a protein molecule? It could be likened to having a big, thoroughly mixed pile containing equal numbers of red beans and white beans. There are also over 100 different varieties of beans. Now, if you plunged a scoop into this pile, what do you think you would get? To get the beans that represent the basic components of a protein, you would have to scoop up only red ones—no white ones at all! Also, your scoop must contain only 20 varieties of the red beans, and each one must be in a specific, preassigned place in the scoop. In the world of protein, a single mistake in any one of these requirements would cause the protein that is produced to fail to function properly. Would any amount of stirring and scooping in our hypothetical bean pile have given the right combination? No. Then how would it have been possible in the hypothetical organic soup?

The proteins needed for life have very complex molecules. What is the chance of even a simple protein molecule forming at random in an organic soup? Evolutionists acknowledge it to be only one in 10113 (1 followed by 113 zeros). But any event that has one chance in just 1050 is dismissed by mathematicians as never happening. An idea of the odds, or probability, involved is seen in the fact that the number 10113 is larger than the estimated total number of all the atoms in the universe!

Some proteins serve as structural materials and others as enzymes. The latter speed up needed chemical reactions in the cell. Without such help, the cell would die. Not just a few, but 2,000 proteins serving as enzymes are needed for the cell’s activity. What are the chances of obtaining all of these at random? One chance in 1040,000! “An outrageously small probability,” Hoyle asserts, “that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup.” He adds: “If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction that life originated [spontaneously] on the Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court.”

However, the chances actually are far fewer than this “outrageously small” figure indicates. There must be a membrane enclosing the cell. But this membrane is extremely complex, made up of protein, sugar and fat molecules. As evolutionist Leslie Orgel writes: “Modern cell membranes include channels and pumps which specifically control the influx and efflux of nutrients, waste products, metal ions and so on. These specialised channels involve highly specific proteins, molecules that could not have been present at the very beginning of the evolution of life.”

Answer 5

Recipes and invention are keep in secret by their developers?, as well I do believed that any good business idea it has also its secrets?, so let say while God create One man and one woman and everything started. some place I read that some how perhaps magically or mysteriously a Sacred tree came into the picture, exactly the one from where Eve have the fruit and gave it to Adam?, and then what we know about this passages is they lost, what God has giving then. I think if I where to tell you the secrets of life, and the secrets of good and Evil knowledge, I will need for you some remuneration in Gold and A lot of GOLDDDD...., My friend Life is God Business and that is it. do your own leg Work it seams the right thing to do. That is my Data,!>

Answer 6

you are somewhat equivocating when you use origins and the scientific method

the scientific methods was made by creationists such as Lord Bacon and involves the repeatable, testable and observable This generally speaking applies neither to macro evolution or creation in general

what you toute as 'scence' in modern times is philosophical materialism.humanism plus an interpretation of data seen in that light.... a religious view PLUS a view of the data biased by the presuppositions of naturalism

Answer 7

There is no evidence to support the creation theory. However, the evidence for evolution, as I see it, is the changeof virus and bacteria colonies/populations to become immune to medical cures through survival of the fittest. There is also all the fossil evidence of different shapes of human skulls and different creatures throughout history and the like. Unless of course, as many creationists state, they are just God's tests of our belief in him or that they are seperate extinct species.
The huge accident seems more likely to me than the universe being created by an invisible deity with no beginning and no end who occupies the vast expanse that is space whilst only caring for one species on one planet - us.

Answer 8

Now you have to be a twelve year old kid otherwise why the dumb question. Nobody has ever claimed that there is data available to support creationism. And I hate to point it out but it is not possible with scientifically verfiable data (or otherwise) to prove evolution either. You ask for no rants from the bible which is grossly unfair. either you want an answer to your question or not. Clearly you do not want an answer this is yet another veiled attack on Christianity. Give it up. Neither theory can be proven so I am happy for people to choose whichever they prefer. I happen to believe that neither option is anywhere near the truth. And by the way, what else would creationists be relying on other than the bible.

Answer 9

Lets Do this using Regula Falsi. Assuming the Evolution Theory or any Scientific theory is correct, then everything comes from another older thing. Continuing the fact that all things comes from its origin, where did that origin came from? Then will go infinitely. In fact, the data you are finding is everything you see, coz Science will never find the origin of all things, but We, Christians, know the origin of all things, the foundation of this universe. Coz the faith we have is believing in things that we did not seen before.

Answer 10

In science you sometimes have to make assumptions - to bridge gaps. I'm not religious and don't beleive in any God, but I do have one to make one serious assumption that does support creationism.

I beleive the big bang did happen and that the universe is still expanding as a result of that explosion. The assumption I have to make is that someone (or something) put all of the matter in place, so that it could collapse in on itself and then explode. I didn't, so who, or what, did?

But, to take it to the next level, who or what created the thing caused the big bang?? This could go on forever.....