Obesity causes a plethora of health risks, why aren't parents held accountable by the law?

Question

Since a parent can be charged with child endangerment for giving a child toxins that cause similar ailments, why not overfeeding?

Answer 1

I have no idea. You make an interesting point, overfeeding your child or not encouraging exercise is like allowing them to play in the street or lighting their cigarettes for them. This is truly an interesting question.

Answer 2

you understand, that is a toughy extremely. mothers and fathers with overweight little ones are often over weight themselves.So in the journey that they are unable to maintain their very personal well being subject matters then they're going to maximum probably be unable to maintain their youngster's. maximum medical doctors are lenient with this difficulty because some little ones commence out as little piggys and then commence to loose weight as they grow old and drop the toddler fat. i for my area imagine that a well being care specialist ought to signify that the mothers and fathers of and overweight baby a eating routine plan or propose the youngster be positioned on one(prepare them so the completed relatives can changeand propose a dietiction or therophist).and then if the record sees no consequences after a particular era of time and has ruled out all different available motives except undesirable ingesting conduct and ought to educate the mothers and fathers at the instantaneous are not doing as advised..........then the mothers and fathers should be reported.allowing CPS to step in and gives you the mothers and fathers a guild line to adhere to and in the journey that they don't look to be met, convinced eliminate the youngster.till the mothers and fathers can take administration of their lives and ingesting conduct. yet, weight problems is an extremely difficult element, that is hereditary 9 cases out of 10 and also you may't purely punish someone for having undesirable genes and then carring them into their baby. I'am a baby of overweight mothers and fathers.purely about each body in my relatives is overweight...except for me.The genes are there and in me...yet, i maintained my weight on my own...wasn't difficult, i grow to be an weird and wonderful baby and hated sugary meals and such. yet, i grow to be taught very undesirable ingesting conduct.My sister has battled her weight purely about her finished existence and is now finally taking administration of her ingesting conduct and that of her households besides.solid interest SIS! *excuse the undesirable spelling,spell verify would not artwork)

Answer 3

because the truth is, many parents try to keep their kids from being overweight.

it is not always successful howver, due to the high probability it is genetic or others might be overweight because of steroids due to lung disease, consume the very foods the gov allows for sale...there are, sorry to say many other issues.

trust me....i didn't have to eat much growing up and i was still fat.
it had nothing to do with overeating.

who should be accountable? the goverment....foods now days are laden with steroids, additives, fillers, chemicals and many other very bad and unhealthy components....fake sugar tops my list of the most unhealthy chemical there is and things in vaccines and the air we breath certainly don't help matters any either.

do some research before posting a question such as the one you asked...eventually you will figure it out.

Answer 4

Is it the duty of the government to tell us how to raise our children? Would that not be an infringement of our freedom. I hate to hear crap like this spewed by anyone. It is not the job of the government to protect us from our own stupid mistakes. The hypocricy of some people knows no bounds to be honest with you. Those on the left will say that a woman has a right to choose, but in the same breath they will want to impose restriction after restriction on people for stupid stuff like this.

Answer 5

unless you are a parent of an overweight child, I don't think you should talk. Kids get fattening food from places other than home. You can teach them all about choices, and then the kids choose what they want. I personally think you should 'go after' smokers that smoke in front of their kids, or trap them in the car and smoke in the same car, or smoke in front of them after they give them their inhalers for asthma. Besides, the social system for child protection has trouble watching what they should already...don't give em any more jobs

Answer 6

I am so tired of everything being termed "child abuse". Now it's what you feed your children. It is WAY past time to back off of terming everything someone doesn't agree with or every tiny mistake or wrong as child abuse. And I do not like the way food is being demonized either. Food is food. It is not "good" or "bad", it is food. I'm not talking about sodas or cheetos. If you want to go after something, go after the soda companies.

Answer 7

They should be but there is already too much government and social interference in how kids are raised. Remember the old days when if the kid acted up they were sent to bed without supper? Now that is child abuse.