If Iraq had WMD's?

Question

Do you think going to war with them would be justified?

Answer 1

If???


They did, Saddam Hussein used them against the Kurds and the Iranians....

Oh but I keep forgetting that liberal don't like that part of history and ignore it whenever possible.

Answer 2

Iraq had WMDs in 80s but by the time the US thought it was wrong to have weapons that they had actually sold to Iraq these weapons were useless. The conservatives never consider the life span of gases and bio weapons. They degrade over time and leak out of their containers. By the time the US invaded every chemical or biological weapon that Iraq had was useless.

The question that should be asked is if Iraq had WMDs why did they not use them against the US? Why use them against the Kurds but not the US invaders? Let the conservatives answer those questions!

Should the US be invaded because it has WMDS? The US are also working on new nukes and new bio/cemical weapons. Is that grounds for invasion? There is a lot of do as I say and not as I do going on.

Answer 3

No because the nations and people against the war did not care that Iraq may/may not have had WMD's. They opposed US invasion. Period.
Finding WMD's would not have made a difference other than from making the US not look stupid.

Answer 4

No .Because United Nations was verifying the issue of Iraqi WMD using logic and scientific approaches by experienced inspectors and experts .If the opportunity was given to them for some more months they would be able to prove that Iraq has no such weapons.

Answer 5

WMD's or not, war with Iraq was not only justified but MANDATED by the UN (who chickened out because of scandal).

Saddam broke EVERY term of the peace treaty, he STOLE BILLIONS of dollars in UN and WORLD money instead of distributing it to the dying children and other people who were freezing and starving in his country. He built palaces instead of infrastructure. He dug huge lakes to ensure HE had plenty of water and kept it hostage for his Sunni cronies in the Western Baghdad area.

Oh, and he DID have WMD's. That should have never been the focus, however.

Answer 6

Have you not been reading all the debate about this subject for weeks now? Why keep asking the same questions over and over again. All you need to do in search is type in wmd and you will be reading all opinions for at least a month. Try it.

Answer 7

If Iraq had WMD's we would not have gone to war with them.

Answer 8

FACTS: Saddam Hussein never developed a WMD himself, a handful of WMD was given to him by the U.S, handed by Rumsfeld in the 70's, to use it against Iran and Kurdish rebels.

Why did the U.S, gave Saddam WMD to use against the Kurdish and the Iranians?. Because, then Saddam was a legitimate U.S. ally who was seen a regional dominate. (Read more, you will than see how things changed)

Hints: Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein were best friends. (do a research).

Answer 9

Yep, President Bush # 41 got the bums rush with the war with Iraq...Saddam talked a bunch of smack to the President and hurt our country...
Then came 911 and all chit hit the fan. Long story short Saddam talked more smack talk and President #43 lowered the boom on Saddam. took Saddam of his throne and out of the spider hellhole and had him strung up like the outlaw he was
God,,John Wayne must be proud of our country now!
Well, we all like a good war story and our country right or wrong is still my country....so love America or leave it...as those are your options..but what do i know?

Answer 10

If Iraq had WMDs, the US invasion of Iraq was valid.