evolution takes millions of years to see any slight changes, so it can't be proven wrong yet, and it is deemed to be correct since its not proven wrong yet. evolution is also not fully supported by evidence for all its assumptions, hence its a hypothesis still, not yet in its thesis stage. therefore, evolution theory is just as good as other religions are(u cant disprove nor prove it). hence, the evolutionists voicing their opinions here, in this religion section, instead of being scientific about it in the science section(because they arent science). correct?
2007-02-08 20:24:31 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
i have a hunch that the evolutionists are going to do the only scientific thing they can do in their identity : report this question and then go off thinking he's won the battle. can someone evolve their non-working brains away?
2007-02-08 20:30:49 · update #1
when i say they're in the R&S and not science section, i mean making a din like the way they are blasting other religions in here and making themselves seem silly. they do lots of religion bashing here but not science bashing in the science section, for they're only capable of that. science cant bash science, but religions can bash religions. get it?
2007-02-08 20:34:58 · update #2
voodoid, since when did i say they're atheists? i would even suggest their religion is evolution. gee u make me feel smart when im able to answer your unexpectedly weird questions.
2007-02-08 20:36:47 · update #3
MyPreshus: you believe that God created man, and u also believe man evolved from the same ancestors as apes? make up your mind. how can you have 2 different beliefs, just as you cannot have 2 masters?
2007-02-08 20:41:11 · update #4
Evolution is at this time as much of a faith based religion as any other. And they are much more fervent in their missionary work to spread their message than any Christian I know.
2007-02-08 20:29:54 · answer #1 · answered by mark g 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
No, that is because of the fact no longer each and every "evolutionist" has a PhD in Biology. the individuals interior the Biology section could desire to respond to your questions lots extra thoroughly than lots of individuals in this section. might you ask questions approximately physics in this section or the physics section? additionally, Evolution isn't a faith, no better than gravity is a faith, that is merely a certainty. Ask this interior the Biology section and notice how promptly you get close down. I dare you.
2016-11-02 23:22:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trouble with science they cannot measure God so it acts like God is not there but if there is a God then the theories are false and a waste of time. So science HAS to depend on being no God to make it work even though cannot prove there is no God.
Evidences of God are the ancient holy writings, actual history, archeology, Jesus Christ whom most believe existed. To keep the Bible alive, no science can say these are not true or even probably not true.
Science cannot handle creation so it has to blind itself with the possibility of God and look around and make alternative models of how things come about. But it only gives a simplistic results. Science cannot explain how humans can find the complex beauty in music, poetry, language, art, philosophy, justice, love just for starters these are gifts rather than non-aware evolved selection. If evolution was true then religion would not exist it would be not in evolutionary interests. But mankind of all civilisations have deities and a spiritual belief of something being higher than themselves. Spirituality is built in humans and those try to supress it with other things but it is there and all tribes of the earth have religion, there is no athiest nation on earth.
2007-02-08 20:27:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
As it happens, I search for 'evolution' I don't hang-out here. And I am mainly forced to answer 'questions' here because of the lies spread by an immoral anti-science propagandists (like you).
Evolution is a scientific theory supported by an absolutely overwhelming pile of evidence. If you think you have to watch evolution in progress to have any observations and evidence then you are as brain-dead as people think you are.... though that is separately evidenced by the fact that you think that people can't believe in God and evolution. At least you recognise that Evolution is Science and Creationism isn't.
2007-02-08 21:38:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't think you are correct. I am a believer in God and I also believe in evolution. I believe the two can and do co-exist. I believe the discussion of evolution is quite spiritual and was part of God's plan.
Edit: I believe that God created SOUL. Soul came into the physical existence through GOD's plan of evolution. It doesn't have to be one way or the other, sweetie. It can be BOTH. Broaden your horizons and take the blinders off. If you want to consider all possibilities, try this link:
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/cayce03.html
2007-02-08 20:39:21 · answer #5 · answered by MyPreshus 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
No, dude. I think evolution is a perfectly legitimate topic to discuss in R&S. I've seen it discussed in the science section also. What's the problem? I don't understand why people feel "threatened" by evolution.
2007-02-08 20:54:52 · answer #6 · answered by Plato 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm here to stem the lies at the source. Your classic lie is that you cannot infer anything from the past. There is an extensive fossil record that shows the history, and the mechanisms by which it occurred are elucidated. In addition, the fossil record is confirmed because the hypothetical phylogenetic tree predicted genetic homology with great accuracy. That predictive power clearly establishes the status as theory.
2007-02-08 20:41:34 · answer #7 · answered by novangelis 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Hey did you know that people who support the Theory of Evolution find the word "evolutionists" offensive? Didn't know that until today, just thought I would share with you.
The reason why they are in here is because they have to argue with the Creationists. If they convince people that God isn't real and creation is a tool of randomness, it reinforces their belief that there is no God.
Misery loves company, you know?
2007-02-08 20:27:54 · answer #8 · answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Who says they aren't in the science section too?
Why is it that y'all are under the impression that everybody who believes in evolution is an atheist anyway?
I believe in evolution and I'M not an atheist.
My aren't WE preachy.
2007-02-08 20:31:21 · answer #9 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You sound like you've already made up your mind, and are giving thumbs down to all who don't agree with your theory, so I won't elaborate, but I will answer your question by saying NO, not correct.
2007-02-08 20:50:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋