You wanted Saddam to hang and were happy when he was. Why do you not think that George W. Bush (Along with George and Barbara) should not be tried for murder for everyone of our soilders that have lost their lives in this war?
2007-02-08 15:00:08 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I am not against our soliders. I thank each and every one of them. I pray for their well being. However it was not their choice to be there. I think we are fighting a war that was not for us to fight. Sadly we lost so many. A war for us to fight would have been against Obama. However, its funny he got lost in this picture. God bless our troops and what they are doing. God have mercy on our President for what he has done.
2007-02-08 15:26:09 · update #1
I am sorry. I menat Osama, not Obama.
2007-02-08 15:30:12 · update #2
My son is in Iraq. I stand behind all of our troops. They know/knew what they signed up for and protecting our freedom, our religion, our way of life is very costly. God bless those that paid the ultimate sacrifice.Get educated about EXACTLY what we are fighting for. This is a holy war against any non-muslim, i.e., Americans and Jews, basically the entire Western world. Everyone needs to see the big picture here. If we leave Iraq, we leave a country open to be governed by the radical islamists with help from Iran and other islamic countries It is serious business trying to take over the world. Look into American Congress for Truth.org
2007-02-08 15:17:49 · answer #1 · answered by Geenahh 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You liberals are pathetic as a group. Hillary is coming, wether we like it or not. Why can't you left wingnuts just shut up and wait until she gets into office.
You losers are as bad as the terrorists. As soon as they see weakness, they fight harder. When you see the rose colored light of the looney left showing, you have to start blathering about any and every cause about every little thing you see as being wrong in the world, and it all had to be George W. Bush's fault.
You in particular have to try to drag George H. W. Bush and Barbra Bush into the mix (for what reason to support your argument, I have no idea). Why don't you just start mudslinging against President Taft? Or president Lincoln? Why don't you just go ahead and blame any little problem you have in your life on the founding fathers themselves. If they would have written that pesky little paper differently and not allowed individuals their own rights to their own destinies, then your life would have been so much better.
Why don't you just relax? The call of '08 is "De lib-rallz is commin'. De lib-ralls is commin'." There is nothing that can be done to change that now. I just thank God (oooh, sorry. you probobly don't believe) that Al Gore and (especially) John Kerry did NOT get elected. I know how much worse off we would be now than we are if those left wing wackos were in control.
2007-02-08 23:58:35 · answer #2 · answered by damndirtyape212 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As Chief Executive, Bush is authorized under the Constitution to be Commander In Chief of the Armed Forces. Furthermore, Congress approved funding for the war. Therefore, he has legal authority.
What is the intellectual trajectory of your argument? Should George Washingon have been hanged after the Revolutionary War? Should Madison have been hanged after the War of 1812? Should Lincoln have been hanged for the Civil War? Should McKinley have been hanged for the Spanish/American War? Should Wilson have been hanged for WWI? Should Roosevelt and Truman have been hanged for WWII? Should Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon have been hanged for Vietnam?
2007-02-09 00:40:50 · answer #3 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With your kind of support our soldiers do not need enemies.
Why are you killing Barbara & George Sr.? Why stop there, how about the Pentagon officals, the military that collected the wrong intelligence information, & Congress & the Senate that approved it? Don't forget the military that signed up after 9/11 & knew they would go to Iraq (this group includes my son). I wanted Saddam punished for the hundreds of thousands of murders he did or directly ordered. Your disrecpect for our Military, our President, & our Country is shameful. God bless the USA & may I forever be a patriot of it.
2007-02-08 23:44:22 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Did you just compare Saddam to George Bush? I'm a Rep, but not a Bush supporter and to say this is just being ignorant. First what Saddam did was Genocide, he was a dictator in a totalitarian nation, not a leader in a democratic republic. Saddam ruled by fear and lived his life without morals. Now, Bush...he's not the best president and his rating are almost as low as Truman's, however, do you think HE made the sole decision to sent troops to Iraq? This is why Americans live in a democracy. In war people are going to die, people are going to disapprove. I really don't understand where you're coming from, but I wish you would try to understand this, but i'm not writing to change opinions.
2007-02-08 23:24:39 · answer #5 · answered by The Phoenix 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am an American Soldier. I am a Private in the Army. Saddam Hussein was an evil man, he killed many of his own citizens, he deserved to die. When my Commander in Cheif sends my fellow troops and I overseas to the sandbox to fight for people who can't fight for themselves, to fight for freedom, I am more than willing to serve. If I die in that attempt, then my life would be well spent. I understand the risk, I wouldn't have enlisted if I didn't understand.
2007-02-08 23:22:22 · answer #6 · answered by tcbcyg 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
1. GW Bush did not force any soldiers to sign enlistment contracts. Most people who sign up for the military understand there is a chance they may have to fight, and in the process may be killed, crippled, or disfigured for life. If you ask most of the people returning from duty, they will tell you that they made the decision to join the military themselves. That's why we refer to thier deaths as a 'sacrifice'.
2. GW Bush is in no way affiliated with the foreign fighters and jihadists that are killing our troops. He has never given an order to kill an american soldier, and he has certainly never shot an american soldier himself.
3. Even if we go with your flawed and unrealistic line of thought, the worst crime he could be tried for is reckless endangerment of american troops.
2007-02-08 23:30:03 · answer #7 · answered by Grant G 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Should Eisenhower, Kennedy, Nixon and Ford have been hung for the soldiers killed in Vietnam? Should Clinton be hung for soldiers killed in the lateral failure of Somalia? Should Carter be hung for the soldiers killed in the botched mission to free the hostages in Iran? How about FDR? Should he have been hung for soldiers killed in WWII?
Saddam tortured and brutalized his own people. He was evil and guilty of EVERY human abuse imaginable... and some I am aware of that I could have never imagined! You can not compare those atrocities to deaths incurred in military combat.
2007-02-09 01:22:29 · answer #8 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your talking about enlisted soldiers right? They are doing their job & you are not grateful. Maybe you should correspond with some of them online & see what their true thoughts are, I have. You are very unpatriotic I must say. You outta be ashamed. Thank you to all those who are serving. We DO appreciate it.
2007-02-08 23:15:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
anyone in iraq either has enlisted or re-enlisted since the war began. so how are being forced to be there. i neither need nor want your sympathy.
2007-02-08 23:59:41 · answer #10 · answered by chkibo2000 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋