America's first choice for the new leader of Iraq prior to the invasion in 2003 was Chalabi, who has a house in Iran. One of Chalabi's top aides was considered by many in the intelligence community to be an agent working for Iranian security forces. One of the top Iraqi's provided to the CIA by Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress was suspected of being provided by a 'hostile intelligence agency'.
Is perhaps the failure of the American invasion of Iraq, and the close association of the people who provided to majority of the pre-war intelligence in to the CIA (and the Whitehouse) to Iranian forces no coincidence...?
2007-02-08 14:55:37 · 4 answers · asked by suki_mipenus 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Doesn't matter the Bushes' can't seem to stay out of the Middle East.
2007-02-08 15:00:26 · answer #1 · answered by Celeste P 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think you're onto something. I have long seen Iran as the greatest danger to peace in the middle east. It is as if they are the puppet master who has managed to convince the US to do their bidding.
2007-02-08 22:59:26 · answer #2 · answered by Malikail 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First there were free elections in Iraq.Second we should get rid of the Iranian leader also and replace with free elected official so we can finish our duties there.
2007-02-08 23:02:17 · answer #3 · answered by shawnn 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know man. That's why i always say, I HATE POLITICS....just a bunch of dirty, greedy, power thirst, thugs who called POLITICIANS, play with peoples lives ( waist them offenly) and our minds, JUST TO ACHIEVE THEIR PERSONAL AGENDAS, it's sickening and never ending crap.......
2007-02-08 23:18:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋