Does Intelligent design require an intelligent argument? Because so far, I haven't seen anything of the sort.
2007-02-08 14:33:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
correct. The arguments for Intelligent Design can be summed up as follows:
"Look at that!!! Can you explain that?!!!!....no.....Then it must have been God!!!"
2007-02-08 14:35:42 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
definite, however the concept of relativity, or quantum physics concept on tunneling are all marvelous claims, yet they lack marvelous evidence. How-ever infinite scientists have self assurance in them anyhow. Why? EDIT: i do no longer understand technology? For our information i'm double majoring in the two Biology and Chemistry. Quantum concept usually potential no longer something better than information debris at a microscopic point, yet there are infinite theories interior Quantum Physics that are used to describe numerous issues, jointly with to describe the nuclear fusion created interior the solar. The potential created via the solar isn't adequate to create the mild.... that's why scientists created the tunneling concept, wherein the proton is "on the different area" of the barrier of the cloud. It has no evidence what-so-ever, yet it continues to be a concept maximum scientists have self assurance. 2nd, how do you clarify the concept of relativity and how it lacks evidence, yet infinite scientists have self assurance in it? Or how approximately 'the concept of each and everything'. EDIT: you have by no potential examine a technology textbook have you ever? Scientists are continually utilising the be conscious 'have self assurance'. Its no longer a non secular term via itself. To have self assurance potential to have an opinion For some reason you think of that each and one and all scientific theories have good evidence. they do no longer. maximum theories have not got good evidence, because of the fact technology merely does not merely be attentive to issues superb away. It takes a protracted time or maybe centuries of experimenting (the scientific approach) to the two prepare or disprove the concept with good evidence. Its why you will in many circumstances hear one scientist say "i do no longer think that concept is authentic" whilst yet another says "I completely have self assurance it rather is what got here about." EDIT: definite, yet planes have additionally been affected interior the very comparable way whilst flying over the Dragons triangle and it had no longer something to do with the concept of relativity and maximum scientists agree.
2016-11-02 22:56:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you have not seen an intelligent argument, you must not be looking for one. Maybe afraid of what you might find?
2007-02-08 14:42:45 · answer #3 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The universe has infinite intelligence.
2007-02-08 14:41:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intelligent design really is an oxymoron.
2007-02-08 14:39:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The same could be said for the "intelligence" of evolution... I haven't seen any intelligent arguments for evolution so where is your evidence???
2007-02-08 14:37:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
They are intelligent in their own world.
2007-02-08 14:36:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dark_apho--You don't know the author? You cannot cite this? You sorry excuse for your lame explanation!!!
Typical Fundie!
Leave the rest of us alone!!!
2007-02-08 14:48:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
List the ID books you've read, sunshine.
2007-02-08 14:37:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
good point, ID is just a way christians, and others, give their beliefs a smart sounding name.
2007-02-08 14:36:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋