Because that's why they are liberals. They care nothing about an unborn child and care more about a killer. Also, I think they have heart trouble, with God.
2007-02-08 13:35:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by the pink baker 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Abortions are no longer covered by taxpayer money, which is good. Most abortions occur early on in the pregnancy when that "unborn child" is really just a clump of cells. I don't think we should be taking women's rights away, especially if they have been raped. If you don't want to get an abortion, then don't get one yourself. But you shouldn't be the judge other people's lives. We all have freedom of choice and freedom of association.
2016-05-23 23:22:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because I would rather see an unformed human terminated than live a loveless life where they are unwanted, or doomed to health problems that will make their life miserable. As for convicted murderers. I am a police officer, we get it wrong, and if there are not checks and balances innocent people die and murderers go free. Believe me, murderers get nothing resembling humane treatment. I think it is funnier to let them live.
2007-02-08 13:24:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by John D 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why do some people make blanket statments that essentialize and stereotype and ENTIRE group of people?
Seriously. Two party politics in America encompass a HELL of a lot of various viewpoints, philosophies, and political beliefs. Making blanket statments in the form of questions on Yahoo Answers that are strictly designed to get people to rally around your inane and one dimensional perception of politics show how juvinille you really are.
2007-02-08 13:18:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Evan 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
MAYBE BECAUSE THE LIFE OF AN INNOCENT UNBORN CHILD IS NOT IMPORTANT TO THEM AND THEY REALLY NOT INTERESTED IN WHAT THIS MATTER IS AND CONSIDERED IT A CONSERVATIVES AGENDA TO DEFEND!
2007-02-08 13:17:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by livinhapi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it's not a child. Can it be declared as a dependant on tax forms before birth?
The entire anti-abortion movement began with the victorian anti-sex movement in the 1800's....you freakazoids act like it's always been around.
Why do conservatives want to force people to ahve children they don't want, but also cut social programs to support the children?
2007-02-08 13:20:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
an unborn child is not a child. It may be a potential human being, but still not quite one. Sorry the potentiality argument doesn't work here.
Convicted they may be, murderers are actual, not potential humans.
2007-02-08 13:14:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Very good.How can an intelligent person regard Jesus as anything other than a troublemaker who got what he deserved.
2007-02-08 13:15:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by sickmates 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, no we don't fight to try and stop murderers, and the child is a choice, get over it...*****.
2007-02-08 13:14:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Because they are messed up in the head, man.
2007-02-08 13:14:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋