If we went to Iraq for WMD and TERROR.Should we invade our own counties with troops on the streets to a iliminate our own home grown terrorists UK,USA,FRANCE,ITALY,SPAIN,GERMANY e.g. or would we get a bit worked up and fight back and blame soldiers for all our troubles or have we forgot about BRITAINS fight on TERROR in IRELAND in which no other counties help back.
2007-02-08 07:25:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I thought the IRA wasn't much of a problem anymore, now that America has stopped supporting and financing them.
2007-02-08 07:34:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's the war on fanatical Islamists, but people are too afraid to say that out loud.
I agree, America didn't help England to fight the IRA. Too many of us supported those terrorists! 9/11 taught us a lesson, and from one American I say we are deeply, deeply regretful.
2007-02-08 15:36:15 · answer #2 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason we haven't is because we are waiting till there is enough to get them on that will put them away for a long long time. Otherwise, it would just be a waste of time on our part.
2007-02-08 15:28:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We do not need to invade our own countries. We already have jurisdiction in our home land and can arrest them. To catch them in other nations who won't do it themselves, we have to invade.
2007-02-08 15:30:25 · answer #4 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
None of the areas you mention have any significant oil reserves.
2007-02-08 17:15:41 · answer #5 · answered by rich k 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be within reach for GWB to declare marital law in the name of the war on terror thereby nullifying our democratic process. For him to have the stones to do that he'd have to retrieve them from his wife's purse
2007-02-08 15:32:52 · answer #6 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋