If yes than that's half evolution half creation, half chemistry half alchemy, half astronomy and half astrology and half physics half witchcraft.
2007-02-08 06:57:53 · 22 answers · asked by Say no to jesus 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No. Science is for science class. Religious BS like creationism is for mythology.
2007-02-08 07:01:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No
Science is based in a system of theory and proofs.
Creation, alchemy, astrology, and witchcraft (we could name more, ad nauseam) are superstitions not based in theory. They are based strictly on faith that can never be quantified nor qualified.
.
2007-02-08 07:08:51 · answer #2 · answered by Icteridae 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Theories are just that, theories, yet to be proved true. Science is full of facts, and creation is not a theory or a myth, but you need faith to believe it. The eyes see and believe, but the heart feels and accepts, that's where science clashes with faith. But all the nature declares God's majesty. I think it is more absurd to believe that "the big bang" created what we see on earth, than to actually believe that there is a SUPREME BEING, (GOD) that created our world. Scientist have everything in equations and formulas, and they want to in-house God in one of their equations....THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE. So no, theories should not be taught in school, but those theories seem to be more eye catching than the truth.
2007-02-08 07:19:13 · answer #3 · answered by MIKE R 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My science teachers in college said they would quit before they taught Intelligent Design or Creation in their classes. And half of them were christian.
edit: we'd had a panel discussion for the college on Intelligent Design being taught in schools.
2007-02-08 07:00:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Only scientific theories. Creationism, alchemy, and astrology are not scientific.
2007-02-08 07:13:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science is for science class. Creationism is for church or intelligent design class whatever. If people started mixng church and state again we'd be living like the puritans.
2007-02-08 07:05:12 · answer #6 · answered by Tokyo Vixen 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, science and science theory should be taught in science class. Just like drawing should be taught in art class, but not drywall installation.
2007-02-08 07:01:33 · answer #7 · answered by tombollocks 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I believe that science should only cover science. If they want to learn about the other side, they should take classes in the other subjects.
2007-02-08 07:01:03 · answer #8 · answered by matrix man 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All the ones that are published in peer reviewed scientific journals. It is science class after all and that is the standard for good science.
2007-02-08 07:00:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
While I personally believe that all knowledge is good knowledge, I think that our children should be taught that there are very few definites in this world and that they can dig for answers and form their own opinions. Teach facts when facts are known, teach enthusiasm for learning the rest of the time.
2007-02-08 07:03:49 · answer #10 · answered by These Eyes See Everything 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋