English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-08 03:31:32 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

4 answers

Ignorance, insecurity and a distorted sense of importance.

Hate crimes have little to do with hate...and more to do with stupidity.

2007-02-08 03:35:53 · answer #1 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 0 0

I think the biggest factor is the lack of education, followed by a very, very low self-esteem. These both lead to the primary reason which is fear.

One cannot discount, however, the sorry household where the person was raised. The acorn never falls far from the tree.....

2007-02-08 05:49:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hate crimes are crimes against persons or groups because the offender has a dislike towards that specific group/person.....race is the most common hate crime, with religion a close second....there have been hate crimes against women, black children, and most common recently is religious beliefs i.e. muslims.

Simply put, if you commit a crime against someone because you dislike something about them i.e. color, religion, beliefs, it can be viewed as a hate crime.

2007-02-08 03:43:01 · answer #3 · answered by Scott & Arlene C 2 · 1 0

The theory of "hate crimes" is a plastic bone thrown to pacify individuals of minority communities who're victims of habit that became already criminal long in the previous the detest-crime regulations have been enacted. that is an arbitrary way of announcing some people prefer extra protection from people in assessment to them than others (no remember if that is simply by fact they're assumed to be extra helpless, i do no longer understand. i understand they seem selective.). that is in fact the legislature meddling in regulation enforcement for no stable reason. something this is against the regulation is not any much less criminal simply by fact it happened to somebody who became no longer in between the secure communities named in hate-crime regulations. i think of that a homicide is a homicide is a homicide, even with the relative race/sexual orientation/ etc. of the two events in touch. If somebody takes a existence, would desire to the punishment hinge on no remember if the sufferer became in a minority classification? i'm white and heterosexual. If somebody kills me, why would desire to my death be taken care of as much less against the regulation than all of us else's? perhaps it encourages extra minorities to return forward. this is the only achieveable element i'm able to think of of. the only difficulty is that the regulations weren't enacted via the police, or perhaps the prosecutors. What truly bothers me is that it style of feels to concentration on the reason, and not the deed. If somebody is lifeless, does it truly make any distinction why somebody else killed him? he's not any further or much less lifeless than if somebody killed him interior the path of robbing him. that is like the regulation is announcing that some murders are worse than others, based on the "team" to which the sufferer belongs. that may no longer genuine. in short, hate crime regulations are an empty gesture. And committing against the regulation against a guy or woman is committing against the regulation against THAT guy or woman, era. there is not any such element as team victimhood in penal regulation. you may no longer even LIBEL a team. The courtroom won't even entertain it.

2016-09-28 14:36:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers