I have heard that a lot of money are spend on a Reasearch based actually , on Darwin...who said we evolved from a monkey..Do you think it is right to spend money on a Reasearch that is telling us we are evolved monkeys and..that .. God doesn't exist?
First that the presidents swears by the Bible, and they shouldn't acknowledge this research and ''institutes ''or so .Good Christians don't realise that their money goes for research in order to tell our children God doesn't exist.
Actually God can be seen only if He wants, and nobody can order this , or a miracle.If they don't accept that the perfect nature is the work of God , than they must wait until God shall offer them ...something ...or a belief.
Besides , even Freud and Jung have affirmed that God and satan is a creation of our mind, so their pseudoscience must not be acknowledged by presidents and parliaments..unless they swear by Darwin Jung and Freud and expect ..these people shall give them the life after death...
2007-02-08 02:54:04 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
This world is filled with freaks! By the way, why do you ask the same question twice?
2007-02-08 03:16:49 · answer #1 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darwin did not say we evolved from a monkey. Chimp and man have 98% the same DNA that indicates that man and chimp evolved from the same species. Darwin was a brilliant man an advanced thinker. It is very important to study evolution and find out as much about it as passable. Evolution has advanced far past Darwin. Much of it has been proved factual. Though it still remains a theory as long time evolutionary changes can not be observed. God is the silliest thing ever to be invented by man. He is a complete fantasy like the Easter bunny and tooth fairy. Don't ever presume your ignorance compares to Darwin, Freud or Jung. You are nowhere close to their league. You are so wrapped inside your cocoon of ignorance you cant see beyond your nose. Don't let your boogie man Satan jump out and bite your butt.
2007-02-08 03:11:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Researching evolution in humans is studying humans. Do you like the idea that if you get sick, you can go get medicine and then perhaps live? If so, then that is from the study of medicine which is a very complex study of biology and biology and evolution as so intertwined and dependent on each other that it is impossible to seperate the two.
Do you want to do like christianity has tried to do in the past? Hold down science because it offends your beliefs? It has not worked in the past. We now know the world to be round. We now know the world to not be the center of the universe. We now know the world to be revolving around the sun.
Most if not all of the major scientists recognize evolution as fact. Sorry if that offends you. What next? Ban palenontology because it shows creatures not mentioned in the bible? Ban geology because it shows that the age of the earth does not match the bible or that there was no global flood? Ban archeology because it finds evidence that contradicts stories of the bible?
2007-02-08 02:58:09 · answer #3 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"I have heard that a lot of money are spend on a Reasearch based actually , on Darwin...who said we evolved from a monkey"
Don't spend so much time around liars. The creationist propagandists you're getting this nonsense from are simply lying to you, and you're falling for it hook, line, and sinker.
If "good Christians" don't want to participate in modern society, they're welcome to move out of the U.S. and go found their own little swillhole somewhere else.
2007-02-08 02:58:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Religion is regarded by the common man as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.
Most of your Politicians, or Religious leaders don't believe even half of what they are preaching. Religion is a system of control. Everyone knows that being Christian gets more votes in America and that's the reason to associate yourself with it. You won't agree; but what do you know?
2007-02-08 02:59:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
confident quite some money is spent on examine in evolutionary biology. No, it is no longer a waste. confident, i think of that's good to take a place in that examine, somewhat inner maximum money. you're incorrect that Darwin reported we are developed monkeys. Evolutionary biology exhibits that we developed from a hassle-free ancester with monkeys (yet, no longer monkeys according to se). you're incorrect that evolutionary biology says that God would not exist. Evolutionary biology says no longer something in any respect the type. tens of millions of human beings have faith in God and additionally settle for the concept of evolution just about as good technology. Catholics, working example, representing greater suitable than a million/2 of all Christians, settle for the concept of evolution just about as good technology. maximum Christians do no longer study the Genesis as a literal step-via-step account of introduction. the incontrovertible fact that the President swears via the Bible is in basic terms a rely of private decision. he's no longer required to swear ON something in any respect. All he has to do is take an oath or confirmation. He want no longer contain any e book or image. you're incorrect that Christianity demands denial of the concept of evolution. It in simple terms would not. it is no longer a sin to have faith interior the concept of evolution. it is no longer a sin to be uncertain approximately it. it is no longer a sin to study the e book of Genesis as some thing different than a literal account. additionally, blasphemy is, in its broadest definition, some type of utterance against God or cursing/insulting God. the concept of evolution isn't anti-God or a curse/insult to God. It would not supplant God, or mock or contemporary any affront to God. That being the case, it is no longer, whether a waste or fake or in spite of, blasphemy.
2016-12-17 05:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are referring to federal funds, it's irrelevant. Determining which scientific research is valuable and allocating funding based upon religious doctrine violates our Constitutionally guaranteed right of separation of church and state.
http://www.firstfreedomfirst.org/resources/issues/soundscience
http://www.au.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8594&abbr=cs_
As to the oath of office for public servants--the swearing on a Bible thing is not required by law, no matter which office is involved. It's a popular tradiition, a 'photo op,' but has no legal value.
http://candst.tripod.com/tnppage/arg11.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/oathoffice.htm
2007-02-08 03:17:25 · answer #7 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't sound like you even know what YOU believe.
Swear by Darwin? You fool - atheists do not accept arguments from authority like any decent scientist.
Also evolution isn't anti-god, its pro-truth, if you feel thats the same thing then you need to change your religious ideas.
2007-02-08 02:58:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The research isn't based on "Darwin"; the research is based on observable facts that Darwin happened to notice.
2007-02-08 02:57:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just another shining example of the dumbing down of America.
And all the more reason to keep inforcing the separation of church and state.
2007-02-08 03:00:26 · answer #10 · answered by Stormilutionist Chasealogist 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋