could be sooner if their (iran's) threats materialize.
2007-02-08 02:32:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by daddio 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Since there is no plan on attacking Iran without any provocation or justification, like, say, Clinton's unprovoked attack on Serbia, any action of the US towards Iran would be a retaliatory strike after Iran did something.
I'm just trying to figure out whose side France will be on.
2007-02-08 10:42:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
To many it should have happened long ago.
If the US's "stop the future sociopaths" strategy is going to work, it will require a long conflict with lots of attrition. So it won't happen for a long while. The Israelis my nuke them soon though.
So my money is on 2010
2007-02-08 10:39:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wonka 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah, I think May sounds about right. Once we here aren't expecting it or have moved on to another topic of interest du jour.
2007-02-08 10:35:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Learning Conformity 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
once they located and sink the two submarines near by
2007-02-08 10:41:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by kimht 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If it does happen, trust me it will be justifiable. They are completely nuts over there.
2007-02-08 10:32:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by J S 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I dont think the American people can take it. No invasion
2007-02-08 10:34:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by papabear098 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
never. it would cause more harm than good.
2007-02-08 10:34:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by b 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I dunno which month but it's 2007 allright.
2007-02-08 11:15:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-02-08 11:13:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋