Answer very honestly (please).... Islam - Christianity - Hinduism - Sikhism ???

Question

Which Religion makes more sense according to you regarding everything like science - future - past - present and events...regardless to moral grounds bcuz they all speak peace so letz put tht aside...cuz i can create my religion talking abt peace but i wont be able to create 1 cuz i duno future nor past or anything. Answer honestly which 1 makes more sense.. ( my say Islam according to me) i wana kno yours n post ur comment also 1 sentence at least y ....Thnx in advance to every1 4 being honest..

Answer 1

Hinduism makes far more sense than any other faith.
Actually it gives reason for every thing it believes. If you take questoins like, Who are you ? Who is god ? What will happen after deat ? What is the pupose of life ?
These are major questions that many faiths cannot clearly answer. Moreover, it is peaceful religion with one god ( it worshipis many gods as images of one god, I am hindu, I worship the only one unseen spirit, as muslims do )

Answer 2

It is Roman Catholicism.

Roman Catholics are the true Christians.

Protestants are not.

Protestants kept on bashing other religions and they kept making myths about the Roman Catholic Church.

For example, the "title" of the pope, Vicarius Filii Dei. It is related with 666, which is the bad number.

Vicarius Filii Dei, an epithet for the Pope which means literally "vicar of the son of God", adds up to 666 if only the letters with Roman numeral values are included (VICarIVs fILII DeI would give VICIVILIIDI = 5+1+100+1+5+1+50+1+1+500+1). This epithet was never used by the Catholic church itself and was likely invented by a person who believed that the Antichrist would be a Pope.

This is not true and it promotes disunity.

Protestants always target the Roman CAtholic Church and kept on opposing the Church.

But the truth is that the teachings of the Protestnats are wrong because they misinterpret the Bible and made a new translation of the Bible (New International version) to support their beliefs. That is why their Bible is corrupt.

Roman Catholicism makes sense because it does not bash other religions.

Even though it is always persecuted by other religions, it still does not persecute other religions.

Answer 3

I think any religion would solve the same purpose. everyone has some pros and some cons...all these religions were formed very long back and they had rules and regulations according to those times..it is the need of people in the new times to create a new religion...when budhhism was created it was right for that time and when bhai religion was formed it was right for then...
we should accept the good things from all religions and live a comfortable life....

Answer 4

My dear friend,one thing you should know is that the aim of all religions is to eradicate comparisons and bring the whole human race together. So please stop comparing them...

Like all people and books, each religion is unique in itself teaching us something or the other. I quote again they are unique (and not different). I dont recall even the holy Mohammad saying that Islam is the best and the rest are second best and so on. He was a loving person who believed in equality and so should you brother...There are better things to be questioned in life.Leave religion to the gods

God bless

Answer 5

None of the above. To me the most logically acceptable religion would be Buddhism. It's the one religion where the emphasis is on human potential and how to cultivate our minds to become the best person we can. No omnipotent force who passes out rules as regulations. Buddha is merely a guide for the rest of us.

"The Tathagatha can only point the way; you will have to walk it yourself"

And if you've realised, it's the ONE religion who's past has not been tainted with bloodshed and war.

Gaté gaté, paragaté, parasamgaté, bodhi svaha.

Answer 6

The only religion that ever made any sense to me was Buddhism. I think the Buddha deliberately avoided putting an emphasis on the supernatural or theological dogma which is why Buddhism doesn't have the same trouble gaining credibility as other belief systems.

Answer 7

That's the most bogus question to ask.
First answer this... How many people answering here KNOW anything about more than one religion?

Not a single person who subscribes to one religion, would know much about another religion.
This question is like asking a child who's the best father in the world... Got my point?

Answer 8

None of the above.

My vote: Judaism. Islam and Christianity cannot exist without Judaism being true....therefore I prefer to stick with the source.

As for Hinduism....too many gods

Sikhism....quite frankly, don't know enough about it to comment other than every Sikh I've ever known has been an absolutely lovely person.

Answer 9

None of them. Potentially Budahism or Taoism. The problem with most of these religions is that they are based on the existence of one or more gods and there is no proof for that. They also tend to add strange things like women covering their faces or restrictions on foods that really don't make sense, in that if you create man as an omnivore why restrict them to vegatables?

Answer 10

Sanatana Dharma is based on the Veda. Veda means knowledge of everything, material and spiritual. It has everything, science of the soul, universe, measurement of three phases of time etc...
Essence of Vesas deal with three subjects
1. Establish relationship of the soul with God
2. Doing different process, karma-yoga, jnana-yoga dhyana-yoga,
and Bhakti-yoga.
3. Achieving love of Godhead as the ultimate goal

Actually the whole purpose of Bhagavad-gita is to revive our sanatana-dharma, which is the eternal occupation of the living entity. Sanatana-dharma does not refer to any sectarian process or religion. It is the eternal function of the eternal living entities in relationship with the eternal Supreme Lord. The English word "religion" is a little different from sanatana-dharma. Religion conveys the idea of faith, and faith may change. One may have faith in a particular process, and he may change this faith and adopt another, but sanatana-dharma refers to that activity which cannot be changed. Man professes to be a Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist or any other sect. Such designations are not sanatana-dharma. A Hindu may change his faith to become a Muslim, or a Muslim may change his faith to become a Hindu, or a Christian may change his faith and so on.
His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada,
founder of ISKCON.

Some excerpts from a lecture by Prabhupada on October 6, 1969, at Conway Hall, London, England
Ladies and gentlemen, today's subject matter is the teachings of the Vedas. What are the Vedas? The Sanskrit verbal root of veda can be interpreted variously, but the purport is finally one. Veda means knowledge. Any knowledge you accept is veda, for the teachings of the Vedas are the original knowledge...

The Vedas are not compilations of human knowledge. Vedic knowledge comes from the spiritual world, from Lord Krishna. Another name for the Vedas is Sruti. Sruti refers to that knowledge which is acquired by hearing. It is not experimental knowledge. Çruti is considered to be like a mother. We take so much knowledge from our mother. For example, if you want to know who your father is, who can answer you? Your mother. If the mother says, "Here is your father," you have to accept it. It is not possible to experiment to find out whether he is your father. Similarly, if you want to know something beyond your experience, beyond your experimental knowledge, beyond the activities of the senses, then you have to accept the Vedas. There is no question of experimenting. It has already been experimented. It is already settled. The version of the mother, for instance, has to be accepted as truth. There is no other way.